Let $\alpha = \{v_1, ..., v_n \}$ be a orthonormal basis. Let $Q$ be the change of basis matrix from the standard basis to $\alpha$. We know that $$Q = \begin{bmatrix} | & & | \\ v_1 & \dots & v_n \\ | & & | \end{bmatrix}$$ And $$Q^t = \begin{bmatrix} - & v_1 & - \\ & \vdots & \\ - & v_n & - \end{bmatrix}$$ Then $Q^tQ$ clearly has entries $<v_i, v_j>$ So it is the identity. This is easy but how do I verify that $QQ^t$ also is the identity. I am having trouble because i have to take the rows of $Q$ and columns of $Q^t$. I tried showing that the rows of $Q$ form an orthonormal basis, but couldnt, is there any other way to show this? My textbook says that it is a similar computation to $Q^tQ$ but I cant see this.
2026-03-28 14:55:15.1774709715
Change of basis matrix from standard basis to orthonormal basis is an orthogonal matrix
80 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in CHANGE-OF-BASIS
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- What is meant by input and output bases?
- Change of Basis of Matrix: Two points of view
- Change of Basis (Transformation Matrix)
- Diagonalization and change of basis
- Change of Basis Matrix. Doubt about notation.
- Why does the method of getting a transition matrix seems reversed to me?
- Finding bases to GF($2^m$) over GF($2$)
- Block diagonalizing a Hermitian matrix
Related Questions in ORTHOGONAL-MATRICES
- Minimum of the 2-norm
- Optimization over images of column-orthogonal matrices through rotations and reflections
- Functions on $\mathbb{R}^n$ commuting with orthogonal transformations
- A property of orthogonal matrices
- Rotating a matrix to become symmetric
- Question involving orthogonal matrix and congruent matrices $P^{t}AP=I$
- Finding An Orthogonal Transformation Matrix
- Which statement is false ?(Linear algebra problem)
- Every hyperplane contains an orthogonal matrix
- Show non-singularity of orthogonal matrix
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The usual approach to showing that $QQ^T = I$ is, as I suggest in my comment, to note that $AB = I$ for square matrices $A,B$ generally implies that $BA = I$, perhaps using the fact that $B = A^{-1}$. In short, $$ Q^TQ = I \iff Q^{-1} = Q^T \iff QQ^T = I. $$ However, there is an approach here that is (arguably) more direct. Contrary to your textbook's claim, I would not call this a "similar computation to $Q^TQ$"; it is not generally true that a matrix having orthonormal columns should imply that it has orthonormal rows, and the fact that this changes in the case that the matrix is square requires justification.
Recall that for an orthonormal set $S = \{v_1,\dots,v_n\}$ and any vector $x$, the sum $$ \langle x,v_1\rangle v_1 + \cdots + \langle x,v_n\rangle v_n $$ denotes the projection of $x$ onto the span of $S$. If $S$ is a basis of $\Bbb R^n$, it follows that $$ x = \langle x,v_1\rangle v_1 + \cdots + \langle x,v_n\rangle v_n. $$ Thus, for every vector $x$, we have $$ (QQ^T)x = Q(Q^Tx) = \pmatrix{v_1 & \cdots & v_n} \pmatrix{\langle v_1,x \rangle\\ \vdots \\ \langle v_n,x \rangle} = \langle x,v_1\rangle v_1 + \cdots + \langle x,v_n\rangle v_n = x. $$ That is, we have $(QQ^T)x = x$ for all vectors $x \in \Bbb R^n$, from which it follows that $QQ^T = I$.