I'm having trouble getting my head around how Euclidean spaces, bilinear forms and dot product all link in with each other. I am told that on a Euclidean space any bilinear form is denoted by $$\tau(u,v) = u\cdot v$$ and in an orthonormal basis we have $$u \cdot v = \underline{u}^T \underline{v}$$ but what, say, if we have an orthonormal basis on a vector space together with a positive definite symmetric bilinear form (so a Euclidean space) then $$\tau(u,v) = \underline{u}^T \underline{v}$$ but what now if we keep the same vector space, the same orthonormal basis, and the same vectors $u,v$ but we change the positive definite symmetric bilinear form $\tau$ surely the computation $\underline{u}^T \underline{v}$ will be the same but the computation $\tau(u,v)$ will surely change? Can someone please explain this?
2026-03-29 18:32:21.1774809141
Changing the bilinear form on a Euclidean space with an orthonormal basis.
334 Views Asked by user26069 https://math.techqa.club/user/user26069/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in BILINEAR-FORM
- Determination of symmetry, bilinearity and positive definitiness for a linear mapping
- Using complete the square to determine positive definite matrices
- Question involving orthogonal matrix and congruent matrices $P^{t}AP=I$
- Equivalent definitions of the signature of a symmetric matrix
- Complex integration and bilinear operators
- Hermitian form on a complex vector space: troubles!
- Can you show this is a bilinear form?
- Interpretation of transpose of a linear application from a matricial product point of view
- Prove that 1. $\kappa(x,y)$ is a symmetric bilinear form? 2. $\kappa([x,y],z)=\kappa(x,[y,z])$
- How does the non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form on $\mathfrak{h}$ induce a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form on $\mathfrak{h}^*$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Orthonormal is defined with respect to $\tau$. That is, with no positive definite symmetric bilinear form $\tau$ around, the statement "$\{v_1,...,v_n\}$ is a an orthonormal basis" is meaningless.
Once you have such a $\tau$, then you can say $\{v_1,...,v_n\}$ is an orthonormal basis with respect to $\tau$." This means that $\tau(v_i,v_i) = 1$ and $\tau(v_i, v_j) = 0$ when $i\neq j$.
Often, once a $\tau$ has been chosen, one doesn't write "with respect to $\tau$", but technically it should always be there.
So, when you say
(emphasis mine) you have to be careful because you can't stick with the same orthonormal basis. When you change $\tau$, this changes whether or not your orthnormal basis is still orthonormal. So before computing $\underline{u}^T\underline{v}$, you must first find a new orthonormal basis, then compute $u$ and $v$ in this basis, and then compute $\underline{u}^T\underline{v}$.