If I have $f_T(x)=x^2-1$ is that mean that my $T$ is unitary? I tried to show that is not true but I didn't succed so I might missing smoething
2026-03-25 17:45:24.1774460724
Characteristic polynomial of unitary operator
86 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in LINEAR-TRANSFORMATIONS
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- A different way to define homomorphism.
- Linear algebra: what is the purpose of passive transformation matrix?
- Find matrix representation based on two vector transformations
- Is $A$ satisfying ${A^2} = - I$ similar to $\left[ {\begin{smallmatrix} 0&I \\ { - I}&0 \end{smallmatrix}} \right]$?
- Let $T:V\to W$ on finite dimensional vector spaces, is it possible to use the determinant to determine that $T$ is invertible.
- Basis-free proof of the fact that traceless linear maps are sums of commutators
- Assuming that A is the matrix of a linear operator F in S find the matrix B of F in R
- For what $k$ is $g_k\circ f_k$ invertible?
Related Questions in CHARACTERISTIC-POLYNOMIAL
- How to determine the characteristic polynomial of the $4\times4$ real matrix of ones?
- Find eigenvalues given the characteristic polynomial without finding the roots
- Factorizing a polynomial.
- Find the characteristic polynomial |$\lambda - AI $| for this $5 \times 5$ matrix
- On the relation between traces and characteristic polynomials
- Question involving characteristic polynomial of a linear transformation
- How to compute the characteristic polynomial of a companion matrix to a polynomial with matrix-valued coefficients?
- Let $A$ be a $3\times 3$ matrix with characteristic polynomial $x^3-3x+a$, for what values of $a$ given matrix must be diagonalizable.
- Let $A$ be an $n \times n$ real matrix with $n \geq 2$ and characteristic polynomial $x^{n-2}(x^2-1)$, then
- Is $A$ the $2 × 2$ identity matrix?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Considering that $\dim V = \deg f_T = 2,$ we may restrict our attention to the equivalent question of $2 \times 2$ matrices over $\mathbb R$ or $\mathbb C$ (as $f_T$ splits over both fields).
Given any $2 \times 2$ matrix $A = \begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix}$ with characteristic polynomial $x^2 - 1,$ we have that $$\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} = I = A^2 = \begin{pmatrix} a^2 + bc & b(a + d) \\ c(a + d) & d^2 + bc \end{pmatrix}$$ by the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem. Consequently, if $a = 0,$ we find that $bc = 1,$ $bd = 0,$ $cd = 0,$ and $d^2 + bc = 1.$ But this implies that $d = 0$ and $c = \frac 1 b.$ Ultimately, therefore, we have that $$\begin{pmatrix} b \bar b & 0 \\ 0 &\frac{1}{b} \bar{\frac 1 b} \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & b \\ \frac{1}{b} & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \bar{\frac 1 b} \\ \bar b & 0 \end{pmatrix} = AA^* = A^*A = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \bar{\frac 1 b} \\ \bar b & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 0 & b \\ \frac{1}{b} & 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \frac 1 b \bar{\frac 1 b} & 0 \\ 0 & b \bar b \end{pmatrix}$$ so that $AA^* = A^* A = I$ if and only if $b \bar b = \frac 1 b \bar{\frac 1 b} = 1.$ Considering $A$ as a real matrix, then, the only orthogonal $2 \times 2$ matrices with $a = d = 0$ and characteristic polynomial $x^2 - 1$ are $$\pm \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$$ since we have that $\bar b = b$ implies that $b^2 = 1$ so that $b = \frac 1 b = \pm 1.$
We will assume now that $A$ is complex so that $b = x + iy$ for some real numbers $x$ and $y.$ Our condition that $b \bar b = 1$ implies that $(x + iy)(x - iy) = x^2 + y^2 = 1.$ Considering that $x$ and $y$ are real, we must have that $b = \pm 1$ or $b = \pm i.$ (We find the same by analyzing $\frac 1 b \bar{\frac 1 b}.$) Consequently, the only unitary $2 \times 2$ matrices with $a = d = 0$ and characteristic polynomial $x^2 - 1$ are $$\pm \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \text{ and } \pm \begin{pmatrix} 0 & i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix}.$$
Ultimately, all of this is to say that $f_T(x) = x^2 - 1$ is not sufficient to conclude that $T$ is unitary. Particularly, the linear operator $T : \mathbb C^2 \to \mathbb C^2$ corresponding to the $2 \times 2$ matrix $$A = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 + i \\ \frac 1 {1 + i} & 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 + i \\ \frac{1 - i}{2} & 0 \end{pmatrix}$$ satisfies $f_T(x) = x^2 - 1$ and is not unitary. Explicitly, we have that $$AA^* = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 + i \\ \frac{1 - i}{2} & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \overline{\frac{1 - i}{2}} \\ \overline{1 + i} & 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 + i \\ \frac{1 - i}{2} & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \frac{1 + i}{2} \\ 1 - i & 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 0 \\ 0 & \frac 1 2 \end{pmatrix}.$$