
I am a little confused on attached question. For t=1, g(t) =g(1), requires integration upto t=2, which is in future...So how can it be causal? Is it a typo (not causal)?

I am a little confused on attached question. For t=1, g(t) =g(1), requires integration upto t=2, which is in future...So how can it be causal? Is it a typo (not causal)?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
I agree with you. This is not causal.
It looks like a typo. Or perhaps someone fell into the trap of blindly applying the criterion (Wikipedia):
That is, that $h(t)=0$ for $t<0$. Indeed, if we attempt to obtain the impulse response $h(t)$ of this system by computing the output of a Dirac delta, as $g(t)=\mathcal{R}(\delta(t))$, we get a step function, which corresponds to a causal system. But this is wrong, because the system is not time-invariant, hence it does not have an impulse response (or, if you prefer, it depends on two time indexes).