Let $B(0;1)=\{x\in \mathbb{R}^N ;|x|\leq 1\}$, the ball of $\mathbb{R}^N$ equipped with the euclidian scalar product $$x \cdot y=x_1y_1+...+x_Ny_N,\ \ \ x=(x_1,...,x_N),\ \ y=(y_1,...,y_N)\ \ \ |x|=\sqrt{x\cdot x}.$$ Let $\alpha\mbox{ , } \beta \mbox{ two real numbers, } \alpha\geq 0\mbox{ , } a \in \partial B(0,1)$ fix. $$h(x)=\log\left((1-x\cdot a)^{\alpha}+|x-a|^{\beta}\right)$$ Can we find $\alpha$ and $\beta$ such that $h$ is harmonic in $B(0,1)$?
2026-04-02 11:23:40.1775129020
Choose parameters to make a harmonic function
180 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in HARMONIC-FUNCTIONS
- Harmonicity is a local property?
- Harmonic functions satisfying given inequality
- Is there Phragmen-Lindelof for $\mathbb{C}_+$ where $f$ is not bounded on $i\mathbb{R}$ but has polynomial growth?
- Solution of a non homogeneous Laplace equation on the unit disk.
- Complex Analysis - Harmonic function as real part of holomorphic function
- Show that u is harmonic
- Physicists construct their potentials starting from the Laplace equation, why they do not use another differential operator, like theta Θ?
- Prove a family of harmonic functions is locally bounded
- Why is $ u=\log(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})$ not harmonic for $x^2 + y^2 <1$?
- Modulus and argument of a holomorphic function.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Without loss of generality, choose a unit vector $a=(a_1,\dots,a_n)$ with components $a_1=1$, $a_j=0\;\,\forall\,j\geqslant 2$. This may be done by rotation $\,y=Sx\,$ with an orthogonal matrix $S$ such that $(Sa)_1=1$, $(Sa)_j=0\;\,\forall\,j \geqslant 2$. A rather trivial check shows that function $$ h(x)=\ln\Bigl(1-x_1+\sqrt{(1-x_1)^2+x_2^2+x_3^2}\Bigr) $$ is harmonic inside a unit ball $\,|x|<1\,$ in $\mathbb{R}^3$, i.e., $\,\alpha=\beta=1\,$ is the answer to the question for space dimension $n=3$. For all $n\geqslant 2$, there are no other $\,\alpha,\beta\in\mathbb{R}$ with nonconstant harmonic $h$. Restriction $\,\alpha\geqslant 0\,$ proves absolutely unimportant.
Interestingly enough, all more or less sophisticated approaches fail to give a complete answer to the question. Thus conformal mappings are accompanied by restriction $n=2$ on space dimension, a maximum principle for a subharmonic function $|\nabla\,h|^2$ works very nice with any $\,n\geqslant 2\,$ but only for $\,\alpha=0\,$ and $\,\beta>0\,$, and so on, so on, so on. Instead, absolutely unsophisticated, naive Taylor expansion around the origin $\,x=0\,$ gives a complete answer to the question for all required values of $n\geqslant 2$, $\,\alpha,\beta\in\mathbb{R}\,$ along with a bonus option $\,\alpha<0\,$ in addition. The Taylor series
$$ h(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}P_k(x), \quad x\in B=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^n\,\colon\,|x|<1\}, $$ is absolutely convergent inside the unit ball $B$, with homogeneous polynomials $\,P_k\,$ of degree $k$ being harmonic for any $k\geqslant 0$, i.e., $$ \Delta\,P_k(x)=0,\quad \forall\, x\in B\;\Rightarrow\;\forall\, x\in \mathbb{R}^n\;\; \forall\, k\geqslant 0. $$ To establish that either $\,\alpha=\beta=0\,$ or $\,\alpha=\beta=1\,$, it suffices to examine just three cases of $\,k=2,3,4\,$, i.e., examine the implications of identities $$ \Delta\,P_2(x)=\Delta\,P_3(x)=\Delta\,P_4(x)=0\quad \forall\, x\in\mathbb{R}^n. \tag{$\ast$} $$ To find polynomials $\,\Delta P_k(x)\,$, one can apply the Taylor series expansion to the function $$ g(x_1,r)=\ln\biggl((1-x_1)^{\alpha}+\bigl(1-2x_1+x_1^2+r^2\bigr)^{\beta/2}\biggr) $$ with respect to variables $x_1$ and $r$, applying herewith the Laplace operator in the form $$ \Delta =\frac{\partial^2\,}{\partial x_1^2}+\frac{\partial^2\,}{\partial r^2}+ \frac{n-2}{r}\!\cdot\!\frac{\partial\,}{\partial r}\,, $$ and substituting thereafter $\,r=|x'|^2$, $x'\in\mathbb{R}^{n-1}$. Running the available symbolic calculations software readily reduces the identities $\,(\ast)\,$ to four algebraic equations, the three of which: $$ \begin{gather} \alpha^2-2\alpha\beta+\beta^2+2\beta n-2\alpha-4\beta=0, \\ \alpha\beta n-\beta^2 n+3\alpha^2-7\alpha\beta+4\beta^2+4\beta n-4\alpha-8\beta=0,\\ \beta(\beta n+5\alpha-4\beta-4n+8)=0, \end{gather} $$ are more than enough to show that either $\,\alpha=\beta=0\,$ or $\,\alpha=\beta=1\,$.