I want to show that $Z_3 \leq Z_6 \leq Z_{12}$.
Since $|Z_3|$ and $|Z_6|$ divide $|Z_{12}|$, then they must be subgroups of $Z_{12}$. Similarly, $Z_3 $ is a subgroup of $Z_6$. I feel like here I am using the converse of Lagrange's Theorem. Does the converse hold? If not, what other easy way can we use to show that $Z_3 \leq Z_6 \leq Z_{12}$?
So just to see if I have gotten Lagrange's Theorem: I can only use Lagrange's theorem if we know, for example, that $H$ is a subgroup of $G$. In other words, if we already know that $H \leq G$, then it must be the case that $|H|$ divides $|G|$. Correct? Thanks.
You're correct. The statement of Lagrange's Theorem is that IF $H\leq G$ is a subgroup and $G$ is finite, then $|H|$ divides $|G|$. The converse of Lagrange's Theorem is in general not true, but there are partial converses of this, namely the Sylow Theorems/Cauchy's Theorem.
A counterexample to this is given by $A_4\leq S_4$, the alternating group. The order of $A_4$ is $4!/2=12$, but there is no subgroups of order $6$.