Classification of separable algebras over a commutative ring

394 Views Asked by At

A separable algebra over a field can be classified as a finite product of matrix algebras over division algebras whose centers are finite dimensional separable field extensions of the field. (See http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/separable+algebra.)

Suppose we instead have a separable algebra over a commutative ring R. What is the classification result in this case? I am particularly interested in the case that the algebra is finitely generated and projective as an R module.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

I can give a very limited answer: the case when $R$ is semisimple ring.

Mimicking the proof of the classification theorem over fields, let $S$ be an $R$-algebra and $N$ be a (left) $S$-submodule of $S$. As $R$ is semisimple, there exists an$R$-submodule $N' \leq S$ such that

$S = N \oplus N'$

Let be $\pi : S \to S$ be the $R$-linear projector onto $N$ in this decomposition.

I believe you can upgrade it to an $S$-linear one by taking

$\pi' = \mu(-, (\mu \circ (\mathrm{id}_S \otimes_R \pi)) p)$

where $\mu : S \otimes_R S \to S$ is your algebra multiplication, and $p \in S^{op} \otimes_R S$ is your separability idempotent. The fact that $\pi'$ is an $S$-linear projection onto $N$ can be verified even with string diagrams.

This shows that $S$ is a semisimple $S$-module.

You still have a version of Schur's lemma which you can use to get that $S$ is a product of matrices in division algebras over $R$.

Caveats:

  • All of this needs to be carefully checked
  • There isn't an abundance of commutative, semisimple rings: they're just products of fields
  • You have to work harder to get uniqueness