I was reading about Euler's approach for the closed form of $\zeta(2)$. On the same lines, if we instead consider the factorization
$x(1-\frac{x}{\pi})(1+\frac{x}{\pi})(1-\frac{x}{2\sqrt2\pi})(1+\frac{x}{2\sqrt2\pi})(1-\frac{x}{3\sqrt3\pi})(1+\frac{x}{3\sqrt3\pi})(1-\frac{x}{4\sqrt4\pi})(1+\frac{x}{4\sqrt4\pi})...$,
i.e.,
$x(1-\frac{x^2}{\pi^2})(1-\frac{x^2}{2^3\pi^2})(1-\frac{x^2}{3^3\pi^2})(1-\frac{x^2}{4^3\pi^2})...$,
will it just be a matter of finding a trigonometric function representation of this polynomial ($\sin(x)$ in case of Euler's method), that when expanded as a Taylor series, and its co-efficients compared with the polynomial, that we shall be able to find a closed form for
$1 + \frac{1}{2^3} + \frac{1}{3^3} + \frac{1}{4^3} + ...$ ?
Further, if it can be proved that no trigonometric function can express the above polynomial, will that mean that no closed form for $\zeta(3)$ exists?
Please forgive my limited knowledge on this topic, lack of research, and only quoting Wikipedia.
I've seen this closed form over internet a long time ago, wolframalpha confirm that it is correct, but I've also a very limited math knowledge, I have no idea if it can be considered as closed form since it involve the third-order derivative of Gamma or polyGamma functions
I think it's coming from Plouffe's inverter
$\zeta(3) = -{1\over2}\biggl(\gamma^3+{1\over2}(\gamma\pi^2)+\Gamma'''(1)\biggl)$
wolframalpha computation result
Proposed as alternate form by wolframalpha :
$\zeta(3) = -{{\psi^{(2)}(1)}\over2}$
wolframalpha computation result