Say I want to express the following series of complex numbers using a closed expression: $$S(x) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty\left(r\mathrm e^{2\pi\mathrm ix}\right)^n.$$ If we interpret the summands the same way as real numbers then we may derive such an expression: $$\left(1-r\mathrm e^{2\pi\mathrm ix}\right)S(x)=1\iff S(x)=\frac1{1-r\mathrm e^{2\pi\mathrm ix}},$$ and I "know" this holds if $$\left|r\mathrm e^{2\pi\mathrm ix}\right|=r<1.$$ But, I cannot really show why this in fact holds for complex numbers, in particular why the convergence condition $\left|r\mathrm e^{2\pi\mathrm ix}\right|<1$ makes sense (the requirement that the summands being less then one in case of real numbers is clear). I tried to write $$S(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty r^n\cos(2n\pi x)+\mathrm i\sum_{n=0}^\infty r^n \sin(2n\pi x),$$ but didn't manage to make progress.
2026-03-29 20:46:19.1774817179
Closed form geometric series for complex numbers
83 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SEQUENCES-AND-SERIES
- How to show that $k < m_1+2$?
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Negative Countdown
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Show that the sequence is bounded below 3
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Convergence of a rational sequence to a irrational limit
- studying the convergence of a series:
Related Questions in COMPLEX-NUMBERS
- Value of an expression involving summation of a series of complex number
- Minimum value of a complex expression involving cube root of a unity
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- Locus corresponding to sum of two arguments in Argand diagram?
- Logarithmic function for complex numbers
- To find the Modulus of a complex number
- relation between arguments of two complex numbers
- Equality of two complex numbers with respect to argument
- Trouble computing $\int_0^\pi e^{ix} dx$
- Roots of a complex equation
Related Questions in GEOMETRIC-SERIES
- Ratio of terms in simple geometric sequence appears inconsistent?
- What is the value of $x_{100}$
- $a, 1, b$ are three consecutive terms of an arithmetic series, find $a, b$ and $S$ of the infinite geometric series
- Proving in different ways that $n^{n-1}-1$ is divisible by $(n-1)^2$.
- Probability of geometric random variables in certain order
- Derivative of a function $y(x)= \sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty nx^{-n}$
- Upper bound on a series: $\sum_{k = M}^{\infty} (a/\sqrt{k})^k$
- Combined geometric and arithmetic series partial sum
- Existence of a geometric series
- Find the value of $R$ such that $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n! \cdot (\ln 3)^n} = 3^x, \forall x \in (-R,R)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If you remember how the proof of the convergence and sum for a real geometric series goes, that proof works directly for the complex case too.
The first part of the proof concludes that $$ s_k = \sum_{n=0}^k c^n = \frac{1-c^{k+1}}{1-c} $$ and this part depends only on the field axioms, so it works just as well in $\mathbb C$ as it does in $\mathbb R$.
The next part takes the limit of this expression as $k\to\infty$, and what you need there is just that $c^{k+1}\to 0$ when $|c|<1$. That's a simple consequence of the fact that the complex absolute value is compatible with multiplication, so (by induction on $k$ if you insist on strict formality) $|c^{k+1}| = |c|^{k+1} \to 0$.
A different way to think about it is that the real and complex part of each term in $\sum_n (re^{2\pi ix})^n$ is absolutely bounded by $r^n$ -- so if $r<1$, then the real and complex parts of the sum converge separately by the comparison test.
This argument is more general and leads to the idea of a disc of convergence in general.