I was looking at the Collatz Conjecture and I thought of something:
If we denote two operators $a_n = 2n$ and $b_n = \frac{n-1}{3}$, then every number that converges using the Collatz Conjecture can be represented in the form of a continued subscript, like 5: $$b_{a_{a_{a_{a_{1}}}}}$$
And to make it easier to read, I'll remove the subscripts, making it:
$$baaaa1$$
If we remove the $1$, giving $baaaa$, and then replace $b$ as $0$ and $a$ as $1$, we get a psuedo-binary system. Thus $5$ is $01111$ and $7$ is $0101011011101111$. The longer it takes for a number to converge, the longer the number is written down.
I realize that this has an information density much much less than binary, but I was wondering: Given this number system, and given two numbers, $x$ and $y$, how can we determine what their sum, $x+y$ will be, or if it will even exist in this number system?
Adding the binary representations doesn't yield much in this case. But the representation you suggest e.g. baaaa1 is more interesting.
You could compress this system of representation and instead just record the number of a steps, as an index of sorts. Whenever there is a b step, you add another index. It would also be easier to run this in reverse (i.e. divide by two for a and 3n+1 for b).
A few examples:
5: {4} or baaaa
7: {1,2,2,3,4} or babaabaabaaaabaaaa
9: {2,1,2,2,3,4} or baababaabaaabaaaabaaaa
11: {2,2,3,4} or baabaabaaabaaaa
To clarify further, the representations tell you how to construct the number using the operations a and b starting from 1. i.e. 5 is (1 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 - 1) / 3. Each index in the "positional notation" is then a power of 2.
Some insight can be gained using the "positional" notation. For example if you investigate all numbers that only have one index, you'll see that only even indexes (powers) greater than 4 crop up. And that if you look at the binary representations of those numbers you'll see a pattern:
5: {4} or 101
21: {6} or 10101
85: {8} or 1010101
The patterns of allowable indexes and their binary representations are more complex in other cases where there are more steps, but they are finite. That means you could in theory construct the indeces in the positional notation directly from the binary representation of the number without going through the process of applying the Collatz operations. In the example above this obviously can be done.
Note that the "positional notation" is a truncation, because once you reach 1 you go into a loop of baabaabaa... So technically 5 would be {4,2,2,2,2...}.
The Collatz conjecture is then the same as saying that every starting number n has a unique (finite) representation in this system ending in 2,2,2...