Let $M_{1, 1, \mathbb{Z}}$ be a moduli stack of elliptic curves. Denote $M_{1, 1, k}$ its base change to a field $k$. We have the map $j: M_{1, 1, k} \to \mathbb{A}^1_{k}$ which realizes the affine line as a coarse moduli space (via the $j$-invariant). I'm interested in the compactification $\overline{M}_{1, 1, k}$. How to describe it explicitly? It is known that its coarse moduli space is $\mathbb{P}^1_{k}$. What is the fiber at $\infty$? Any references are greatly appreciated!
2026-03-25 15:39:43.1774453183
Compactification of $M_{1, 1}$
169 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in ELLIPTIC-CURVES
- Can we find $n$ Pythagorean triples with a common leg for any $n$?
- Solution of $X^5=5 Y (Y+1)+1$ in integers.
- Why does birational equivalence preserve group law in elliptic curves?
- CM elliptic curves and isogeny
- Elliptic Curve and Differential Form Determine Weierstrass Equation
- Difficulty understanding Hartshorne Theorem IV.4.11
- Elementary Elliptic Curves
- Flex points are invariant under isomorphism
- The Mordell equation $x^2 + 11 = y^3$.
- How do we know that reducing $E/K$ commutes with the addition law for $K$ local field
Related Questions in MODULI-SPACE
- Concavity of moduli space of Kahler-Einstein manifolds
- Canonical metric when $-K_X$ is nef?
- Characterization of Kahler-Einstein manifolds
- Why is any coarse moduli space for hypersurfaces is a categorical quotient?
- General twisted cubics
- For which CM points $\tau$ is $\gamma(\tau)$ also a CM point?
- Does every homeomorphism of a Riemann surface have an isotopic biholomorphism?
- Is the concept of vector bundle is a special case of the notion of family of algebraic varieties?
- Does $ H^1 (X , \mathcal{O}_X^{ \ * }) $ represent the following moduli functor?
- Equivalent definitions of $\Gamma _1(N)$-structures on elliptic curves
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-STACKS
- Pushforward of quasi-coherent sheaves to quotient stack for finite group action?
- Map from schemes to stacks
- Examples of Stacks
- Showing $GL_n$ is a special algebraic group
- Object of a Category $C$ acts as Functor
- Calculating etale cohomology of Picard stack
- Why is this called the cocycle condition?
- Automorphisms and moduli problems
- Grothendieck topology on stacks/fibred category
- Making $H^*(\mathbf{P}^\infty)=\lim H^*(\mathbf{P}^n)=k[t]$ precise using stacks
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The Deligne-Mumford compactification is by nodal curves, so the fiber at $\infty$ is a nodal curve of genus $1$ with $1$ marked point $p$, which is unique up to isomorphism since its normalization is a copy of $\mathbb P_k^1$ with $3$ marked points ($p$, and the two points lying over the node), and the marked points can always be taken as $0,1,\infty$ after applying an automorphism.
Note 1: just to be clear, we do have $\mathbb P_k^1$ appearing both as the moduli space AND as (the normalization of) a fiber of the universal curve over it. I only mention this for the same reason one sometimes distinguishes between $4$ arising as $2+2$ and $4$ arising as $2^2$: it's one of those things that, while baked into the nature of reality, seems designed to cause confusion.
Note 2: I'm by far best informed about the case where $k$ is algebraically closed, but I don't think there are subtleties here. The only potential issue I can think of is that genus $0$ does not necessarily imply $\cong \mathbb P^1$; but such curves have no $k$-points, and you have assumed the existence of the $k$-point which is marked in the initial setup.