This is a step to prove Maschke’s theorem. Let $G$ be a finite group, every indecomposable $G$-module is simple $\iff$ complete reducibility. For finite dimensional representation, we can prove this by induction on dimension. How to prove this for infinite dimensional case?
2026-02-27 20:11:30.1772223090
Complete irreducibility of infinitely dimensional representation
66 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-OF-ALGEBRAS
- Given a $\mathbb{k}$-algebra $A$ and two $A$-modules $M$ and $N$ find $\dim_{\mathbb{k}}\left(\mathrm{Hom}_{A}(M,N)\right)$
- Jacobson radical of the $\mathbb{k}$-algebra $\mathbb{k}[x]/\langle x^n\rangle$ where $\mathbb{k}$ is a field
- Complement of a maximal direct factor is indecomposable
- length of minimal projective resolution and projective dimension
- Path algebra $A=kQ$ is not isomorphic to $A^{op}$
- Prove that |Λ/e| = |Λ|-|P|
- Confusion about operators and representations
- Exact sequences of indecomposable Kronecker-modules
- Existance of certain derivations on the Temperley-Lieb algebra:
- Why $H$ in $\mathfrak{sl}_2$ triple is always semisimple?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It's easy to show that complete reducibility implies that every indecomposable representation is simple.
If you can show complete reducibility for finite-dimensional representations, then you can show it for the regular representations $k[G]$ (where $k$ is the base field). But this means that $k[G]$ is a semisimple ring. Over a semisimple ring, every module is semisimple.
To see the last claim, note that infinite direct sums of semisimple modules are semisimple, so we get that every free module is semisimple. Also quotients of semisimple modules are semisimple, so as every module is a quotient of a free module, this implies the result.