Complex Analysis with Applications, Asmar, Deriving the cubic equation

94 Views Asked by At

The following is part d.) of the project problem 50 from the chapter 1.1 (pp. 12) of Complex Analysis with Applications by Asmar.

Take it as given that $u^3v^3 = -\frac{p^3}{27}$ and $u^3 + v^3 = -q$ for real $u, v, p, q$, and that if two real numbers $U, V$ satisfy equations $U + V = -\beta, UV = \gamma$, then $U$ and $V$ are roots of the equation $X^2 + \beta X + \gamma = 0$. Therefore the previous $u^3$ and $v^3$ are roots of $X^2 + qX - \frac{p}{27} = 0$. With this we would like to conclude that $u = \sqrt[3]{-\frac{q}{2} + \sqrt{\left(\frac{q}{2}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{p}{3}\right)^3}}$ and $v = \sqrt[3]{-\frac{q}{2} - \sqrt{\left(\frac{q}{2}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{p}{3}\right)^3}}$.

By using the equalities $v^3 = \frac{-p^3}{27u^3}$ and $v^3 + u^3 = -q$, it is quite straightforward to apply the quadratic equation to the equation $u^6 + qu^3 - \frac{p^3}{27} = 0$ to conclude that $u^3 = -\frac{q}{2} \pm \sqrt{\left(\frac{q}{2}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{p}{3}\right)^3}$. But I don't know how to proceed beyond this point. I mean that I need to argue why the $-$ in the $\pm$ has to disappear for $u$, and similarly why the $+$ needs to vanish for $v$. But I don't have any compelling argument for this. Sure, for a particular $u$ and $v$ the signs are as they need to be, but the problem statement gives away that these signs should be in general for the defined $u$ and $v$.

Edit: $u$ and $v$ are defined as $y = u + v$, where $y$ represent a change in variables by $x = y - \frac{a}{3}$, where the original cubic equation is $x^3 + ax^2 + bx + c = 0$ for real $a, b, c$.