The statutory method for the computation of Easter in the UK (and presumably also the USA) is contained in the Calendar (New Style) Act 1750. This is the same Act which moved the British Empire from the Julian calendar and onto the Gregorian. The Act and the method it specifies remains in legal force in the UK.
This employs a tabular method of calculating Easter which does not explicitly refer to the "epact" (which from what I gather, is the standard way in which the Roman Catholic Church makes the calculation).
The Act as currently in force is reproduced here (the relevant tables are reproduced as images toward the end of the document): https://www.legislation.gov.uk/apgb/Geo2/24/23/section/6
Complicating the matter, some of the tables which were originally enacted, and which gave detailed data for dates before 1900, were repealed by the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1948, and so they are not reproduced in the current legislation. However, this repeal appears also to have deleted a block of text from the modern reproduction. The original Act, therefore, can be viewed in full here (page 206 onwards): https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rLsuAAAAIAAJ&lr&pg=PA206
I have also stumbled on a link that apparently reproduces the same content in HTML, and with modern typesetting, but does not attempt to provide any further explanation: http://www.eskimo.com/~lhowell/bcp1662/info/tables/index.html
Basically I ask, does anyone have a comprehensive mathematical analysis of this specific statutory method? That is, how the typeset tables are produced from first principles, and how the tables are then worked in an explicit, step-by-step fashion?
I'm broadly familiar with the concepts and terminology involved in the Easter calculation, but in terms of applying this method I find I'm falling down even at the very outset: "To find the Dominical or Sunday Letter, according to the Calendar, until the Year 1799 inclusive, add to the Year of our Lord its Fourth Part, omitting Fractions;".
What does it mean, "add to the Year ... its fourth part"? The obvious modern interpretation of this is to add a quarter again - multiply the year by 1.25 and then floor - but I can't find any basis to be certain of this, or understand why such an apparently arbitrary constant is employed.
OK, so I think I've sort of got the process (or at least, I'm getting the right answers out). I'll go through it for this year for an example:
As for why that works, we'll look at each part in turn:
Incidentally, it does work: this page has a javascript implementation, which has been verified to match the epact method.