Let $T>0$ arbitrary but fixed. Consider $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ any function in the Schwartz class. Now define the quantity:$$ J(t):=\int_{\vert \tau T\vert>1}(i\tau)^{-1}e^{it\tau}\widehat{f}(\tau)d\tau. $$ I am reading a book on which the author says that, for any $b,b'\in\mathbb{R}$ such that $b-b'<1$, the latter integral can be "trivially" bound in $H^b(\mathbb{R})$ by: $$ \Vert J\Vert_{H^b(\mathbb{R})}\leq \Vert f\Vert_{H^{b'}}\sup_{\vert \tau T\vert>1}\tau^{-1}(1+\vert \tau\vert)^{b-b'}. $$ I am trying to recover this bound but I haven't succeed, so I am wondering if anyone has any hint. So far I have just tried the obvious, I tried to write the $H^b$ norm in terms of the Fourier Transform of $J$ (by using Plancharel's Theorem) as $$ \Vert J\Vert_{H^b(\mathbb{R})}=\Vert (1+s^2)^{b/2}\widehat{J}(s)\Vert_{L^2(\mathbb{R})}. $$ However, I am now sure how to compute its Fourier Transform since it is a very complicated function. I think that once you write down the Fourier transform of $J$ the idea would be just to somehow multiply and divide by $(1+\tau^2)^{b'/2}$ in the inner integral and then to use Cauchy-Schwarz in order to pull out the $H^{b'}$ norm of $f$.
2026-03-25 06:27:40.1774420060
Computing the $H^s$ norm of a time-dependent integral operator
45 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in SCHWARTZ-SPACE
- Why is it so obvious that $x^k e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}}$ is a Schwartz-function? (Verification)
- Schwartz kernel theorem and dual topologies
- Convolution Identity for Schwartz Space
- Prove that if $f \in \mathcal L^1(\mathbb R)$ then $fx^n \in \mathcal S'(\mathbb{R})$
- Schwartz kernel theorem and order of distribution
- Help understanding the weak topology on the dual of the Schwartz space?
- reshape $(2\pi)^{-n/2} \int_{\mathbb R^n} \mathcal F(\varphi) (\xi) e^{- \frac{\varepsilon^2|\xi|^2}{2}} e^{i\langle x, \xi \rangle} d\xi$
- Continuity of Fourier Transform between Schwartz Space
- If $\hat{f}\in L^2(\mathbb{R})$ then $\hat{f}$ is rapidly decreasing.
- Equivalent definitions of Schwartz Space
Related Questions in FRACTIONAL-SOBOLEV-SPACES
- Inclusion map between Sobolev space
- $H^{\frac12}$ norm and preimage via the trace operator
- Embeddings between Hölder spaces $ C^{0,\beta} \hookrightarrow C^{0, \alpha} .$
- For which functions $u$ is $\partial_\nu u \in H^{-1/ 2}(\partial\Omega)$?
- Localization of Sobolev functions is continuous
- Counter example for analogous Poincare inequality does not hold on Fractional Sobolev spaces
- $H^s$ norm of a Fourier transform
- comparing two Sobolev spaces:$W_0^{s,p}(\Omega)$ and $\overline{ C_c^{\infty}(\Omega)}^{~~W^{s,p}(\Bbb R^d)}$
- Bi Laplacian operator explicitly form
- Relationships between fractional Sobolev space, Bessel spacse and Hajłasz–Sobolev space
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Again I think I have solved my own question. Please, I would really appreciate any comment if you think that this answer is not sufficiently rigorous.
Answer: First, let us recall that $\mathcal{F}(e^{iat})(s)=\sqrt{2\pi}\delta(s-a)$. From now on I will omit any $2\pi$ factor. Thus, we have $$ \qquad \mathcal{F}_t\big(J(t)\big)(s)=\int_{\vert\tau T\vert>1}(i\tau)^{-1}\widehat{f}(\tau)\int_{\mathbb{R}}e^{i(\tau-s)t}dsd\tau=\int_{\vert\tau T\vert>1}(i\tau)^{-1}\widehat{f}(\tau)\delta(s-\tau)d\tau \qquad (*) $$ Now, define $A:=(-\infty,-1/T)\cup(1/T,+\infty)$ and write the right-hand side of the latter identity as: $$ (*)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\mathsf{1}_A(\tau)(i\tau)^{-1}\widehat{f}(\tau)\delta(s-\tau)d\tau=(is)^{-1}\mathsf{1}_A(s)\widehat{f}(s), $$ where $\mathsf{1}_A$ denotes the characteristic function of the set $A$. Hence, replacing this identity into the $H^b$ norm of $J(t)$ we obtain $$ \qquad \Vert J\Vert_{H^b}^2=\int_{\mathbb{R}}(1+s^2)^{b}s^{-2}\mathsf{1}_A(s)\widehat{f}(s)^2ds\leq C\Vert(1+s^2)^{b-b'}s^{-2}\mathsf{1}_A(s)\Vert_{L^\infty}\Vert(1+s^2)^{b'/2}\widehat{f}\Vert_{L^2}^2 \qquad (**) $$ Then, by enlarging the constant if necessary, the right-hand side of the latter display can be bound by $$ \Vert f\Vert_{H^{b'}}^2 \sup_{\vert sT\vert>1}s^{-2}(1+\vert s\vert)^{2b-2b'} $$ Finally, by plugging the latter bound into $(**)$ and taking square root in both sides of the inequality we obtain the desired result.
Please let me know if you think the proof is wrong.