Determine the order of $(\mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z} )/ \langle(2,2)\rangle$ and $(\mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z} )/ \langle(4,2)\rangle$. Are the groups cyclic?
I've read many solutions on the internet including here (see 20\187) and here as well as the answer in my book. None of them made sense to me since they all seem to have contradictory methods and answers.
In general, what are people doing when they are trying to find the order by adding $(0,1), (1,0)$ or some variation of those elements to the generators? Could someone work out this one problem for me (with explanation of each thought process)? I am getting tired of seeing only shortcuts and solutions with no justification for their steps.
Let's start with a simpler case: $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$. Here, $2\mathbb{Z}=\{\ldots,-4,-2,0,2,4,\ldots\}$. So, the cosets of $2\mathbb{Z}$ in $\mathbb{Z}$ are the $z+2\mathbb{Z}=\{\ldots,z-4,z-2,z,z+2,z+4,\ldots\}$. If that $z$ would happen to be $2$, we'd get back $2\mathbb{Z}$ (just shifted over one). Thus $2+2\mathbb{Z}=2\mathbb{Z}$. Since you can write any number as $2m+n$ where $m$ is some integer and $n$ is $0$ or $1$, we can characterize all cosets of $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ by $2m+n+2\mathbb{Z}=n+2m+2\mathbb{Z}=n+2\mathbb{Z}$, so the only two cosets are $2\mathbb{Z}$ and $1+2\mathbb{Z}$.
Now, keeping that process in mind, let's do $(\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z})/\langle(2,2)\rangle$. We have $$\langle (2, 2 ) \rangle =\{\ldots,(-4,-4),(-2,-2),(0,0),(2,2),(4,4),\ldots\}$$ Now if somebody adds $(1,0)$ to each of these numbers, we get $$(1,0)+\langle (2, 2 ) \rangle =\{\ldots,(-3,-4),(-1,-2),(1,0),(3,2),(5,4),\ldots\}$$ If we keep adding them, we will keep shifting the left and right numbers apart: they'll never equal $\langle (2, 2 ) \rangle$ again because nothing modifies the second coordinate. Thus, the group is infinite.
Now, is it cyclic? It's infinite, any any infinite cyclic group is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}$. This is where the part where you can add $(1,1)+\langle(2, 2 )\rangle$. You can easily verify this has order $2$ in just the same way as the $2\mathbb{Z}$ example, and $\mathbb{Z}$ contains no elements of finite order, so it must not be cyclic.