Confusion in Null Quantification

396 Views Asked by At

I just started reading Mathematical Logic

MY QUESTION

Language, Proof and Logic

This part is from Language, Proof and Logic by John Etchemendy and Jon Barwise

They mention "if the variable x is not free in wff P then ∀x(P) ⇔ P", then we can take P= ∃x f(x).

But I saw in Kenneth H. Rosen's Book

Kenneth H. Rosen

They mention a "quantified variable does not appear in a part of statement"

Both Statement are very different. But both statement are for P, So should be same.

Which Statement is correct?


P.S. :- Sorry in advance because my English is not upto that mark. Edits are welcome :)

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

Kenneth is refering to $A$ as the statement, not $P(x)$.   Like this: $$\underset{\text{quantfied variable}}{\forall \underset\uparrow x~(P(x))}\vee \underset{\text{statement}}{\underset\uparrow A} \equiv \forall x~(P(x)\vee A)$$

So, as long as the quantified variable $x$ does not occur free within statement $A$, and the domain is not empty, we can establish rules for distribution.