Constant of Integration in Equilibrium Theory of Tides Derivation

56 Views Asked by At

I am preparing an elementary derivation of Newton/Laplace's equilibrium theory of tides.

The derivation of the tractive force is understood, as is the derivation of the differential equation for change in ocean height (assuming a spherical water covered Earth).

However, I am stuck with this following reasoning on page 14 of the link below.

https://www.uaf.edu/files/sfos/Kowalik/tide_book.pdf

The authors claim that the differential equation is as follows:

$$ \frac{dh}{d \theta} = - \frac{3r}{2} \frac{m}{M} \left( \frac{r}{R} \right) ^3 \sin(2 \theta) $$

[Their I.40]

where:

  • $h$ is the change in height of the water
  • $r$ and $M$ are the radius and mass of the Earth
  • $R$ is the distance from the Earth to the Moon
  • $m$ is the mass of the Moon.
  • $\theta$ is the angle from the the north pole (ignoring axial tilt, assuming Moon is equatorial)

The authors solve it to give:

$$ h = r \frac{m}{M} \left( \frac{r}{R} \right) ^3 \left(\frac{3}{2} \cos^2\theta + c \right) $$

Here's the trouble: to determine $c$, the authors quote (Proudman, 1953) which I cannot access. They claim that the condition for conservation of mass of water is:

$$\int_{0}^{\pi} \left(\frac{3}{2} \cos^2\theta + c \right)\sin\theta d\theta$$

I don't understand why there is a sine in this integral. What is its physical significance?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

I suppose that $\sin \theta d \theta$ comes from the fact that the volume element in spherical coordinates is $dV=\rho^2 \sin \theta d \rho d\theta d\varphi$ and the symmetry of the problem is such that the variation of the volume , that must be null, depends only from the polar angle $\theta$.