Limits in a category can be built as a combination of the basic limits that are products and equalizers. Is there a similar construction for 2-limits in a 2-category? If yes, is it from products and equalizers, or some other basic limits? How do you, for example, built a comma object (a special case of 2-limit) using this construction? How does it instantiate in the 2-category of 1-categories?
2026-03-27 21:41:12.1774647672
Construction of 2-limits in 2-categories
1k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in HIGHER-CATEGORY-THEORY
- Quillen equivalence between sSet (Joyal's model structure) and sSetCat (Bergner's one)
- What is an intuitive Geometrical explanation of a "sheaf?"
- $\infty$-categories definition disambiguation
- Applications of $\infty$-categories
- Simplicial categories and simplicial objectcs. HTT Remark 1.1.4.2
- $n$-categories and associahedrons.
- Weak notion of equivalence in a category
- The $2$-category of monoids
- Higher homotopy groups in terms of the fundamental groupoid
- Pseudolimits equivalent to limits
Related Questions in LIMITS-COLIMITS
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
- Prove that a "tensor product" principal $G$-bundle coincides with a "pullback" via topos morphism
- What prevents me from starting the cone in the objects mapped by the diagram
- Two morphisms $f, g : M \to L$ are equal as long as they are equal under the limit $L$.
- Separating coproducts by its index set
- Preservation of coproducts by coproducts
- Categorification of commutative sum
- Colimit of a directed system of modules
- Pullback square with two identical sides
- Subring of an inverse limit is the entire thing if maps to pieces are surjective
Related Questions in 2-CATEGORIES
- Description of the 2-monads for (strict) monoidal categories
- Can we see FdHlb as a 2Category of groupoids?
- Is there such thing as a morphism of natural maps and what does it look like?
- Right (bi)adjoint of the inclusion of $\mathbf{Grpd}$ in $\mathbf{Cat}$
- Understanding 2-category theory
- Books/Lecture notes about 2-categories.
- Ind-completion of a 2-category
- Why Strict 2 group is equivalent to Group object in Category of Categories?
- 2-functor and CAT
- Construction of the coproduct of two monoidal categories
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You need more than products and equalisers, but only a bit more: it is enough to have products, equalisers, and cotensors with $\mathbf{2}$ (the free arrow, i.e. the category $\{ 0 \to 1 \}$). First of all, because every category is obtained as an iterated conical colimit of diagrams starting from copies of $\mathbf{1}$ and $\mathbf{2}$, it follows that you have cotensors with any category. Then, by enriched category theory, we get all 2-limits.
For example, given $f : X \to Z$ and $g : Y \to Z$ in a 2-category, the comma object $(f \downarrow g)$ can be constructed as the conical limit of the following diagram, $$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} @. @. Z \\ @. @. @VV{g}V \\ @. \mathbf{2} \pitchfork Z @>>> Z \\ @. @VVV \\ X @>>{f}> Z \end{CD}$$ where the two arrows $\mathbf{2} \pitchfork Z \to Z$ are induced by the two functors $\mathbf{1} \to \mathbf{2}$.
All that said, a word of caution: what I said applies only to strict 2-limits, which can be quite different from bilimits. To construct bilimits one needs instead (bicategorical) products, inserters, and equifiers.