I have a discrete evolution equation such that $$\rho(t+\tau) = M_0 \rho(t)M_0^\dagger+M_1 \rho(t)M_1^\dagger$$ $M_0\;\&\;M_1$ are two operators such that $tr(M_0^\dagger M_1)=0$ i.e. they are orthogonal and $M_0^\dagger M_0+M_1^\dagger M_1 =1$. I want to convert this discrete evolution equation into a continuous evolution equation. Please give some hint.
2026-05-06 03:14:13.1778037253
continuous evolution
64 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in RECURRENCE-RELATIONS
- Recurrence Relation for Towers of Hanoi
- Solve recurrence equation: $a_{n}=(n-1)(a_{n-1}+a_{n-2})$
- General way to solve linear recursive questions
- Approximate x+1 without addition and logarithms
- Recurrence relation of the series
- first order inhomogeneous linear difference equation general solution
- Guess formula for sequence in FriCAS
- Solve the following recurrence relation: $a_{n}=10a_{n-2}$
- Find closed form for $a_n=2\frac{n-1}{n}a_{n-1}-2\frac{n-2}{n}a_{n-2}$ for all $n \ge 3$
- Young Tableaux generating function
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For $\tau \rightarrow 0$ you can use Taylor series.
$\rho(t+\tau) = \rho(t)+ \frac{d \rho}{dt}\tau$
Therefore
$\frac{d \rho}{dt} = \frac{1}{\tau}\left[ M_0 \rho(t)M_0^\dagger+M_1 \rho(t)M_1^\dagger - \rho(t) \right]$
Since there is only one variable we don't need partial derivative. You can calculate the RHS for $\tau \rightarrow 0$ (numerically or analytically) and that will be your answer.
In case $M_0,M_1$ also depends on both $t$ and $\tau$, it might be possible to go analytically. Let consider $\tau=dt$.
$\rho(t+dt) = \rho(t)+ \frac{d \rho}{dt}|_{t}dt$
$M_0(t+dt) \rho(t)M_0^\dagger(t+dt) = M_0(t) \rho(t)M_0^\dagger(t) + [dM_0/dt \rho(t) M_0(t)^\dagger + M_0 \rho(t) dM_0^\dagger/dt] dt$
$M_1(t+dt) \rho(t)M_1^\dagger(t+dt) = M_1(t) \rho(t)M_1^\dagger(t) + [dM_1/dt \rho(t) M_1(t)^\dagger + M_1 \rho(t) dM_1^\dagger/dt] dt$
Now let say, $\rho(t)$ commutes with both $M_0$ and $M_1$. In that case the above two terms will give you
$[M_0M_0^\dagger+M_1M_1^\dagger]\rho(t)+[dM_0/dt M_0(t)^\dagger + M_0 dM_0^\dagger/dt + dM_1/dt M_1(t)^\dagger + M_1 dM_1^\dagger/dt] \rho(t)dt$
$\Rightarrow \rho(t) + \frac{d}{dt}[M_0M_0^\dagger+M_1M_1^\dagger]\rho(t)dt \Rightarrow \rho(t)$
So your $\rho$ will be constant in time.
Otherwise you have to keep all the terms.