Say that you are counting down from 10. You say how long is left after half the amount of time you said how long was left (Like 10, 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.125, etc.). Because when you halve repeatedly you can never get down to 0, wouldn't you have to say how long is left infinitely many times before you can reach 0 seconds?
Update:
8 months ago, Vsauce uploaded a video about a similar problem to this, which he called Supertasks: Watch it at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffUnNaQTfZE.
On
You will have to speak very fast because you'll have to squeeze in infinitely many words into these $10$ seconds. But you will still only wait $10$ seconds.
If the clock stops while you're saying the amount of time that has left, then you will never reach $0$, but you will get so very close to it. By definition this would be a Sisyphean task.
You haven't given enough of an explanation. You've only explained what you're doing during the times $t$ in the interval $[0,10)$, where $t$ measures the seconds since you started counting. However, you do say something infinitely many times within that interval.
You haven't said anything about what you're doing for the remaining time. Normally, given that the problem is phrased in terms of the "real world", we'd invoke continuity, and conclude that you would say "0 seconds left" when $t=10$. However, this breaks physical assumptions -- e.g. the speed at which your mouth is moving increases without bound, and the sound waves from your speech would eventually be strong enough to shatter the Earth.
So the usual implicit conventions we make for such problems really don't apply: you have to describe what happens at (and possibly after) $t=10$ before we can know if you will ever reach $0$.