I've looked at the other two problems similair to mine but I'm having a bit of an issue understanding as their solutions seems a bit more complex. While I for the most part understand my professors logic I am a bit confused when it comes to combinatorics.
So for a finite set, he says that let $n = |A|$ $n$ is also the number of reflexive ordered pairs. I understand this part. So next since we are crossing the set $|A x A|$ = $n^2$ which is the number of total ordered pairs from the cross.
So where I am getting a bit lost is he says that there are $2^{n^2-n}$ relations that are both reflexive and symmetric. So I hope I am understanding this part right. But is that because if we have all ordered pairs, and we want to include them or not include them then thats 2 choices so we have $2$ well we have $n^2$ pairs, and we don't want to include the reflexive pairs in our choice so we must subtract them which is why we have $2^{n^2-n}$
So later he proves that for the # of relations that are both reflexive/symmetric we have $(2^n)(2^{\frac{n^2-n}2})$ Here I am loss,why are we giving the reflexive pairs a choice if we are trying to find # of relations that are both reflexive/symmetric then wont not including one mean that relation is not reflexive? and is the above expression equivalent to $(2^{\frac{n^2+n}2})$
$(2^n)(2^{\frac{n(n-1)}{2}})=2^{\frac{n(n+1)}{2}}$ (exponents add when you multiply) is the number of symmetric relations that are not necessarily reflexive. The $2^n$ factor disappears when we impose reflexivity because it counts the number of ways to choose a set of pairs of the form $(a,a)$, of which there are $n$.