How to derivate (covariant derivative) the expressions $R\cdot Ric$ and $Ric^2$ where $Ric^2$ means $Ric \circ Ric$? Here, $Ric$ is the Ricci tensor seen as a operator and $R$ is the scalar curvature of a Riemannian manifold.
2026-05-05 16:28:35.1777998515
Covariant derivative of $Ricc^2$
127 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
We want to compute $$(\nabla(R\cdot Rc))(X)$$ Connections commute with contractions, so we start by considering the expression (where we contract $X$ with $Rc$, obtaining $Rc(X)$) $$\nabla(R\cdot Rc\otimes X) = (\nabla (R\cdot Rc))\otimes X + R\cdot Rc\otimes (\nabla X)$$ Taking the contraction and moving terms around, we get $$(\nabla(R\cdot Rc))(X) = \nabla(R\cdot Rc(X)) - R\cdot Rc(\nabla X)$$ For the second one, notice that $$Rc\circ Rc = Rc\otimes Rc$$ after contraction, so we proceed as before and start with $$\nabla[Rc\otimes Rc\otimes Y] = [\nabla(Rc\otimes Rc)]\otimes Y + Rc\otimes Rc\otimes \nabla Y$$ We contract and move terms to get $$[\nabla(Rc\circ Rc)](Y) = \nabla(Rc(Rc(Y))) - Rc(Rc(\nabla Y))$$
Now notice that using twice the first equality we derived we obtain $$\nabla(Rc(Rc(Y))) = (\nabla Rc)(Rc(Y)) + Rc((\nabla Rc(Y))) =$$ $$= (\nabla Rc)(Rc(Y)) + Rc((\nabla Rc)(Y) +Rc(\nabla Y)))$$ Putting all together we obtain $$\nabla(Rc\circ Rc) = (\nabla Rc)\circ Rc + Rc\circ(\nabla Rc)$$
This was an explicit derivation of everything. You can also use the various rules on the connections on the bundles associated to the tangent bundle to get directly $$\nabla(R\cdot Rc) = dR\otimes Rc + R\nabla Rc$$ (which agrees with the first result, if you work it out a bit) and $$\nabla(Rc\circ Rc) = \nabla(Rc\otimes Rc) = (\nabla Rc)\otimes Rc + Rc\otimes(\nabla Rc) = (\nabla Rc)\circ Rc + Rc\circ(\nabla Rc)$$ where there is a contraction of the tensors in the intermediate steps.