I've been trying to show that the tensor product $V\otimes V$ of a finite dimensional $\mathfrak{so}(2n)$ representation of dimension at least 3 decomposes as a direct sum of at least 3 irreducible representations. I've been trying to use the Steinberg formula as in Humphreys section 24 but I feel like it's too complicated to do so for arbitrary $n$ or I'm just missing something. Is this the way to go or is there a simpler proof maybe using highest weight vectors?
2026-02-28 00:01:56.1772236916
Decomposing tensor products of $\mathfrak{so}(2n)$-representations
336 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in SEMISIMPLE-LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Why is a root system called a "root" system?
- Ideals of semisimple Lie algebras
- A theorem about semisimple Lie algebra
- A Lie algebra with trivial center and commutative radical
- Relation between semisimple Lie Algebras and Killing form
- If $\mathfrak{g}$ is a semisimple $\Rightarrow$ $\mathfrak{h} \subset \mathfrak{g} $ imply $\mathfrak{h} \cap \mathfrak{h}^\perp = \{0\}$
- How to tell the rank of a semisimple Lie algebra?
- If $H$ is a maximal toral subalgebra of $L$, then $H = H_1 \oplus ... \oplus H_t,$ where $H_i = L_i \cap H$.
- The opposite of Weyl's theorem on Lie algebras
- Show that the semisimple and nilpotent parts of $x \in L$ are the sums of the semisimple and nilpotent parts
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-OF-ALGEBRAS
- Given a $\mathbb{k}$-algebra $A$ and two $A$-modules $M$ and $N$ find $\dim_{\mathbb{k}}\left(\mathrm{Hom}_{A}(M,N)\right)$
- Jacobson radical of the $\mathbb{k}$-algebra $\mathbb{k}[x]/\langle x^n\rangle$ where $\mathbb{k}$ is a field
- Complement of a maximal direct factor is indecomposable
- length of minimal projective resolution and projective dimension
- Path algebra $A=kQ$ is not isomorphic to $A^{op}$
- Prove that |Λ/e| = |Λ|-|P|
- Confusion about operators and representations
- Exact sequences of indecomposable Kronecker-modules
- Existance of certain derivations on the Temperley-Lieb algebra:
- Why $H$ in $\mathfrak{sl}_2$ triple is always semisimple?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Combining some of these comments into an answer. It is always true that the tensor square breaks up into (at least) an alternating part and a symmetric part. This is because the action of the representation commutes with the action of the symmetric group $S_2$ swapping the order of the tensor product (for higher tensor powers this becomes more complicated and that's what young tableaux are for). Thus this is true for any Lie group action on a tensor square. These may then decompose even further of course.
If the representation is self-dual there is a $\mathfrak{g}$-invariant bilinear form (it is not too hard to see that this forces it to be symmetric or symplectic in fact). We can think of this form as an element of $V\otimes V$ and $\mathfrak{g}$-invariance means that its span is a trivial representation. As we've noted this should live in one of our symmetric/alternating representations.
Now for $n$ even, all the representations are self-dual. For $n$ odd, this is only true if the multiplicities of the last two fundamental weights in the highest weight are equal.
A quick check shows that it doesn't hold for $n$ odd: $\mathfrak{so}(6)=\mathfrak{sl}(4)$ and one of the half spin representations here is isomorphic to the usual $4$-dimensional $\mathfrak{sl}(4)$ representation (the other to its dual). The tensor product of this with itself decomposes into only $2$ irreducible representations: the symmetric and alternating parts.