I'd like to define $zeroes(n)$ as the number of zeros in the decimal expansion of the integer $n$. A number $n$ is zero_special if $$zeroes(n) > zeroes(n-1)$$ Can I write a function that determines whether $n$ is zero_special? What does "the decimal explansion of the integer $n$" mean?
2026-04-02 21:35:19.1775165719
Define function that tells me if an integer is a zero_special
62 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DECIMAL-EXPANSION
- Finding the period of decimal
- Which sets of base 10 digits have the property that, for every $n$, there is a $n$-digit number made up of these digits that is divisible by $5^n$?
- Is a irrational number still irrational when we apply some mapping to its decimal representation?
- Why the square root of any decimal number between 0 and 1 always come out to be greater than the number itself?
- Why does the decimal representation of (10^x * 10^y) always suffix the same representation in binary?
- Digit sum of $x$ consisting of only 3,4,5,6 = digit sum of $2x$
- How many 3 digits numbers are equal to the sum of their first digit plus their second digit squared plus the third cubed?
- Is it possible to determine if a number is infinitely long?
- What is the logic behind the octal to decimal conversion using the expansion method?
- Is the real number whose $n^{\rm th}$ digit after the decimal point in decimal representation is the leading digit of $2^n$ a rational number?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
In the number $100$ you see two zeroes, so $\mathrm{zeroes}(100)=2$. In the number $5$ you see no zeroes, so $\mathrm{zeroes}(5)=0$. The function $\mathrm{zeroes}$ simply counts the number of zeroes you see when you write the number down. A number is therefore zero-special if, when writing it down, you see more numbers than when you write your original number minus one.
For example, if you write $10$, you see one $0$. If you write $9$ there is no $0$, so $10$ is zero-special. You can check yourself that the numbers $20,...,90$ are also zero special and that no other two-digit numbers are.
I claim that if the number has more than two digits, it is zero special if and only if it is a multiple of 100, i.e. if its decimal expansion ends in 00.Let $a$ be an integer and let $a=a_{n}a_{n-1}...a_{1}a_{0}$, with $0\leq a_{i}\leq 9$ for all $i$, be its decimal expansion. If $a_{0}>0$, then the decimal expansion of $a-1$ is $a-1=a_{n}a_{n-1}...a_{1}(a_{0}-1)$. This either has the same number of zeroes as for $0$ or it even has one more, so $a$ is not zero special.
If $a_{0}=0$ but $a_{1}> 0$, then the decimal expansion of $a-1$ becomes $a-1=a_{n}a_{n-1}...(a_{1}-1)9$. Again, the number of zeroes in this expansion is either the same as for $a$ (if $a_{1}=1$) or it is one higher.
If $a_{0}=0=a_{1}$ and $a_{2}>0$, then the decimal expansion of $a-1$ becomes $a-1=a_{n}a_{n-1}...(a_{2}-1)99$. Now the number of zeroes in the decimal expansion of $a-1$ is strictly lower than that in the decimal expansion of $a$. If we drop the condition that $a_{2}>0$, we simply replace more $0$'s with $9$'s in the decimal expansion of $a-1$. The number of zeroes in the decimal expansion of $a-1$ is again smaller than that in the decimal expansion of $a$.