I am reading this article: http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.5037v1 . In this, it defines a symplectic manifold as a manifold equiped with a nondegenerate bivector field $\pi$ that is Poisson. l want to understand what is a bivector field on a manifold. I couldn't get a definition on manifolds. Thanks for your help.
2026-03-25 22:10:54.1774476654
Definition of bivector field on a manifold.
653 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SYMPLECTIC-GEOMETRY
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- Proof that 1-Form on a Symplectic Manifold is Closed?
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Dimension of the Marsden-Weinstein reduction of a coadjoint orbit in the dual of the Lie algebra of the gauge group (Atiyah-Bott context)
- Symplectic form on the n-torus
- Computing the flow on the cotangent bundle
- Action-angle variables in non-compact level sets
- About the tangent space of a coadjoint orbit
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $M$ be a manifold. A vector field assigns for each point $m\in M$ an element of the vector space $T_mM$.
A bivector field should assign for each point $m\in M$ a bivector (or at least a pair of vectors) in the tangent space $T_mM$. As in the case of vector field, we want this choice of pair of tangent vectors to vary smoothly. To formalise this notion of smoothness, we see a bisector field from an alternate point of view.
Let $\pi$ be a bivector field.
Let $\omega\in \Omega^1(M)$ (a $1$-form on $M$).
Fix $m\in M$.
The $1$-form $\omega$ gives a map $\omega(m):T_mM\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$. The bivector field $\pi$ gives a pair of vectors $(v_1,v_2)$.
Evaluating $\omega(m)$ at $v_1$ gives $\omega(m)(v_1)\in \mathbb{R}$. This in turn gives an element $\omega(m)(v_1)v_2\in T_mM$. Note that $\omega(m)(v_1)$ is a real number and $v_2$ is an element in the vector space $T_mM$. Thus, for each $m\in M$, we have an element in the tangent space $T_mM$. We can ask if these tangent vectors vary smoothly to give a vector field. So, we get a map $\Omega^1(M)\rightarrow \mathfrak{X}(M)$. Starting at a decent map $\Omega^1(M)\rightarrow \mathfrak{X}(M)$, one can go backwards and produce a bivector field.
So, a bivector field can be seen as a nice map $\Omega^1(M)\rightarrow \mathfrak{X}(M)$.
Doing similar kind of manipulations one can see a bivector field as a nice map $\Omega^1(M)\times \Omega^1(M)\rightarrow C^\infty(M)$.