Consider a delay differential equation with initial condition: $$ x_\tau'(t)=f(t,x_\tau(t),x_\tau(t-\tau)),\,t>0;\quad x_\tau(t)=g(t),\,t\in [-\tau,0], $$ where $\tau>0$ is the delay. My question is under which conditions $x_\tau$ tends to $x$ as $\tau\rightarrow0$, where $x(t)$ solves the problem for $\tau=0$: $$ x'(t)=f(t,x(t),x(t)),\,t>0;\quad x(0)=g(0). $$ Is this a standard result in the literature? I thought of using Gronwall's inequality under a Lipschitz condition for $f$: $|f(t,x_1,y_1)-f(t,x_2,y_2)|\leq K(|x_1-y_1|+|x_2-y_2|)$. Then we derive the inequality $|x_\tau(t)-x(t)|\leq K\int_0^t |x_\tau(s)-x(s)|ds+K\int_0^t |x_\tau(s-\tau)-x(s)|ds$, but I do not know how to work with the second integral $\int_0^t |x_\tau(s-\tau)-x(s)|ds$.
2026-03-25 15:38:19.1774453099
Delay differential equation when the delay tends to zero.
124 Views Asked by user312396 https://math.techqa.club/user/user312396/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in ORDINARY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Stability of system of ordinary nonlinear differential equations
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Power series solution of $y''+e^xy' - y=0$
- Change of variables in a differential equation
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Solve the initial value problem $x^2y'+y(x-y)=0$
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
Related Questions in DELAY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- Simplify $\int\limits_{-\infty}^X\exp[-(Ae^x+Bx+Cx^2)]\mathrm dx$ and $\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(-A)^n}{n!}e^{Dn^2-Kn}$
- Prove a function is completely continuous
- Solving differential equations of the form $\theta''(t)+\theta'(t)+\theta(t-\delta)=0$
- How to solve this particular difference equations?
- $f'(x) = f(x-1)$ then $f$ is not bounded
- Bounding Lyapunov functionals
- Existence of a surjective map between the two space $X$ and $C([a,b],X)$
- Solving a Delay Differential Equation with the Method of Steps
- delay partial differential equations
- Linearizing the following equation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
To work with the integral inequality that you derived, $$ |x_\tau(t)-x(t)|\leq K\int_0^t |x_\tau(s)-x(s)|ds+K\int_0^t |x_\tau(s-\tau)-x(s)|ds $$ you can proceed as follows:
First show a uniform in $\tau$ bound for $\|x_\tau(s)\|$ on some interval $[0,T]$. Clearly this has to be possible if the convergence result that you want to prove is true.
This implies a uniform bound for $\dot{x_\tau}(s)$, say $\|\dot{x_\tau}(s)\| \le C_0$ for all $\tau$ and all $s \in [0,T]$.
Assuming also $\|\dot{g}(s)\| \le C_0$ for $s \le 0$ (which is natural), it then follows that $\|x_\tau(s-\tau) - x_\tau(s)\| \le \tau C_0$ for all such $\tau$ and $s \le T$ and therefore $$\begin{aligned} |x_\tau(t)-x(t)|& \leq K\int_0^t |x_\tau(s)-x(s)|ds+K\int_0^t |x_\tau(s-\tau)-x(s)|ds \\ & \leq 2 K\int_0^t |x_\tau(s)-x(s)|ds + KtC_0 \tau \end{aligned} $$ Apply Gronwall's inequality and uniform convergence of $x_\tau$ to $x$ follows on $[0,T]$.