Given a circle with radius 1. Take an arbitrary starting point. Then go around the circle an infinite number of times, always drawing a point when you are one unit further. So the next point is always an arc length 1 step further. Easy to prove that all points will be different! But my question is: is each point randomly close approached? I believe this is true, but I can’t prove it!
2026-04-09 02:04:37.1775700277
Density of points on a circle
195 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in SEQUENCES-AND-SERIES
- How to show that $k < m_1+2$?
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Negative Countdown
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Show that the sequence is bounded below 3
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Convergence of a rational sequence to a irrational limit
- studying the convergence of a series:
Related Questions in INFINITY
- Does Planck length contradict math?
- No two sided limit exists
- Are these formulations correct?
- Are these numbers different from each other?
- What is wrong in my analysis?
- Where does $x$ belong to?
- Divide by zero on Android
- Why is the set of all infinite binary sequences uncountable but the set of all natural numbers are countable?
- Is a set infinite if there exists a bijection between the topological space X and the set?
- Infinitesimal Values
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As mentioned in the comments, this has to do with $\pi$ being irrational. Let's assume that, and go on to prove that you'll end up arbitrarily close to any given point on the circle.
Represent the circle as the interval $[0,2\pi)$ -- basically, a point is represented by how far counterclockwise you have to go from your starting point to get there. In your process, you're starting at $0$ and adding $1$ to your location every step, and when the location becomes greater than $2\pi$, you subtract $2\pi$ so that it lies between $0$ and $2\pi$.
Assume that there's some $0\leq x<2\pi$ and some $\epsilon>0$ for which no point in the interval $(x-\epsilon,x+\epsilon)$ is ever reached. Now, consider the first $$n=\left\lceil \frac{\pi}{\epsilon}\right\rceil$$ steps, and say the locations reached (including the starting point $0$) are $$0=x_0<x_1<x_2<\cdots<x_n<2\pi$$ (note that $x_i$ is not the location after $i$ steps, but the $i$th smallest location in $(0,2\pi)$ that you reach). Since they're all in $[0,2\pi)$, there can't be a distance of greater than $2\epsilon$ between each pair -- otherwise, $$2\pi>x_n=(x_n-x_{n-1})+(x_{n-1}-x_{n-2})+\cdots+(x_2-x_1)+(x_1-x_0)\geq 2n\epsilon\geq 2\pi.$$ So, there must be some integers $a<b<n$ for which the $a$th step and the $b$th step are very close to each other -- within $2\epsilon$. So, the $(b-a)$th step is within $2\epsilon$ of $0$, since going $b-a$ units forward from the $a$th location gets you to a point within $2\epsilon$ of the $a$th location. Let this location be $\delta$ units away from $0$, so it is either $\delta$ or $2\pi-\delta$.
Finally, consider the points reached after $k(b-a)$ steps for various integers $k$. As you add $1$ to $k$, this point moves $\delta$ units around the circle, either clockwise (if the $b-a$th location is $\delta$ units clockwise from $0$) or counterclockwise (if it's counterclockwise from $0$). Because $\delta<2\epsilon$, you can't ever "jump over" the interval $(x-\epsilon,x+\epsilon)$ in this way -- you'll hit some point inside it at step $k(b-a)$ for some integer $k$. So, there is some step that drops you in $(x-\epsilon,x+\epsilon)$, as desired.
Note: This proof is quite similar to a proof of Dirichlet's approximation theorem, which states that irrational numbers are rather well-approximated by rational numbers. Rational approximation, specifically how well certain classes of numbers can be approximated by rationals, is a very deep area of mathematics!