The physical Lagrange equation is the same as the Euler-Lagrange equation. My question is why do we use the $$L=T-V$$ as the Lagrangian?
2026-03-26 22:52:35.1774565555
Derivation of the Lagrange equation
208 Views Asked by user804333 https://math.techqa.club/user/user804333/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PHYSICS
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- What is meant by input and output bases?
- Does Planck length contradict math?
- Computing relative error with ideal gas law.
- Planetary orbits in a $4$-dimensional universe
- Applied Maths: Equations of Motion
- Return probability random walk
- What will be the velocity of a photon ejected from the surface of cesium by a photon with a frequency of 6.12E14 s^-1?
- What mathematical principal allows this rearrangement during simplifying
- Time when velocity of object is zero and position at that point in time
Related Questions in EULER-LAGRANGE-EQUATION
- Showing solution to this function by Euler-Lagrange
- Derive the Euler–Lagrange equation for a functional a single variable with higher derivatives.
- Functional with 4th grade characteristic equation
- derivative of double integral in calculus of variation
- When is the Euler-Lagrange equation trivially satisfied?
- Euler-Lagrange and total derivative of partial derivative for function of two variables
- Energy Functional from the Euler-Lagrange Equations
- Find differential equation using variation principle and lagrangian
- Euler-Lagrange equations without lower boundary conditions
- Finding First Variation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The Euler-Lagrange equation minimize (or maximize) the integral $$S=\int_{t=a}^{t=b}L(t,q,\dot q) dt$$ The function $L$ then must obey $$\frac d{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial q}$$ The expressions above are for a single variable $q$, but it's easy to extend to multiple variables.
So how is this related to physics? You need to choose a function $L$ that has some physical meaning. Note that the function is not unique. If you have a function $L$ that is good, the function $\alpha L+\beta$ will give you the same equations of motion. So what would make a good function? In mechanics, we want $L$ to describe the same physics as Newton's laws of motion. We write the second law as $$\frac{d}{dt}(mv)=F$$ Newton's first law can be derived from this, if we set $m=const.$ and $F=0$. If we assume conservative forces (gravity, electromagnetism), then the force can be represented as a gradient of a potential:$$F=-\frac{dV}{dx}$$ So then we write $$\frac d{dt}(mv)=-\frac{dV}{dx}$$ Now we identify $q=x$ and $\dot q=v$. Then $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial v}=mv$$ and $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial x}=-\frac{dV}{dx}$$ One possible solution (if we assume $L$ is a sum of two functions, one that depends only on $x$, the other only on $v$) is $$L=\frac{mv^2}2-V(x)=T-V$$ Once again, this function is a choice.
After thinking about some of the comments, I realized that there are some changes to the form of the terms that have some definite physical meaning. For example, I can add a term linear in $v$ to $T$, so it becomes $$T=\frac m2 v^2+\alpha v$$ If you complete the square, one realizes that this is just the kinetic energy in a reference frame moving with a constant velocity. Then obviously one can change $x$ to some $x-x_0$, and the equation of motion does not change. Finally, one can add a constant. But since we have partial derivatives with respect to $x$ and $v$, constant means that it does not explicitly depend on those values. But it can depend explicitly on time.