I am attempting to better understand matrix calculus. Given a vector $x$, I understand that: $\frac{\mathrm{d} x^t}{\mathrm{d} x}= I$ but struggle to think about $\frac{\mathrm{d} x}{\mathrm{d} x}$. This website says it is also the identity matrix, but I struggle to understand why. Would taking the derivative of a column vector wrt a column vector produce a tensor? Any intuition is greatly appreciated!
2026-04-05 00:52:07.1775350327
Derivative of a vector x wrt itself
364 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATRIX-CALCULUS
- How to compute derivative with respect to a matrix?
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- Is it possible in this case to calculate the derivative with matrix notation?
- Monoid but not a group
- Can it be proved that non-symmetric matrix $A$ will always have real eigen values?.
- Gradient of transpose of a vector.
- Gradient of integral of vector norm
- Real eigenvalues of a non-symmetric matrix $A$ ?.
- How to differentiate sum of matrix multiplication?
- Derivative of $\log(\det(X+X^T)/2 )$ with respect to $X$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If you use the definition for vector-on-vector differentiation used on Wikipedia here, then the derivative of a column vector with respect to another column vector is indeed a matrix. To provide some intuition, consider $x'=f(x)$ as defining a coordinate transformation. (That is, $x_1'=f_1(x), x_2'=f_2(x)$, etc.) Then $dx'/dx$ is just the Jacobian matrix for this transformation, and it shouldn't be surprising that the identity transformation $f(x)=x$ has the identity matrix as its Jacobian.
Another route is to think in terms of linearization: If $y=f(x)$, then $$f(x+\epsilon h)=f(x)+ϵf′(x)h+\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)=y+ϵ (dy/dx) h+\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)$$ So the linearization of $f(x)$ only works if $(dy/dx)h$ is another column vector, i.e., $dy/dx$ is a matrix. (If you want a headache, try thinking about the $\epsilon^2$ terms!)