Consider a non-autonomous linear system of ode's: $X'=A(t)X$, $X:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^n$. Let $B(t)$ be a fundamental matrix solution $\dot{B}=A(t)B$ of the system and $W(t):=\det B(t)$ the Wronskian. Show that $$\dot{W}=tr(A(t))W.$$ My idea: I started by induction. For $n=2$ we have $B=\left(\begin{array}{cc} x_{1} & y_{1}\\ x_{2} & y_{2} \end{array}\right)$ and $$W =\det B =x_{1}y_{2}-y_{1}x_{2}.$$ Therefore, $$ \begin{eqnarray} \dot{W} &=&\dot{x_{1}}y_{2}+x_{1}\dot{y_{2}}-\dot{y_{1}}x_{2}-y_{1}\dot{x_{2}}\\ &=&\dot{x_{1}}y_{2}-\dot{y_{1}}x_{2}+x_{1}\dot{y_{2}}-y_{1}\dot{x_{2}}\\ &=&\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} \dot{x_{1}} & x_{2}\\ \dot{y_{1}} & y_{2} \end{array}\right)+\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} x_{1} & \dot{x_{2}}\\ y_{1} & \dot{y_{2}} \end{array}\right)\\ &=&\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} a_{11}x_{1}+a_{12}x_{2} & x_{2}\\ a_{11}y_{1}+a_{12}y_{2} & y_{2} \end{array}\right)+\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} x_{1} & a_{21}x_{1}+a_{22}x_{2}\\ y_{1} & a_{21}y_{1}+a_{22}y_{2} \end{array}\right)\\ &=&\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} a_{11}x_{1} & x_{2}\\ a_{11}y_{1} & y_{2} \end{array}\right)+\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} a_{12}x_{2} & x_{2}\\ a_{12}y_{2} & y_{2} \end{array}\right)+\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} x_{1} & a_{21}x_{1}\\ y_{1} & a_{21}y_{1} \end{array}\right)+\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} x_{1} & a_{22}x_{2}\\ y_{1} & a_{22}y_{2} \end{array}\right)\\ &=&\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} a_{11}x_{1} & x_{2}\\ a_{11}y_{1} & y_{2} \end{array}\right)+\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} x_{1} & a_{22}x_{2}\\ y_{1} & a_{22}y_{2} \end{array}\right)\\ &=&a_{11}\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} x_{1} & x_{2}\\ y_{1} & y_{2} \end{array}\right)+a_{22}\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} x_{1} & x_{2}\\ y_{1} & y_{2} \end{array}\right)\\ &=&(a_{11}+a_{22})\det\left(\begin{array}{cc} x_{1} & x_{2}\\ y_{1} & y_{2} \end{array}\right)\\ &=&tr(A)W. \end{eqnarray}$$ Now I suppose that it is valid for $n>2$ and consider taking $n+1$ and the formula for the determinant $$W=\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}(-1)^{i+k}b_{ik}\det B_{ik}$$ where $B_{ik}$ is the $ik$-minor of $B$. Up to here I haven't been able to advance. Any suggestions?
2026-02-23 22:50:19.1771887019
Derivative of the Wronskian
271 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ORDINARY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Stability of system of ordinary nonlinear differential equations
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Power series solution of $y''+e^xy' - y=0$
- Change of variables in a differential equation
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Solve the initial value problem $x^2y'+y(x-y)=0$
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
Related Questions in WRONSKIAN
- Wronskian Problem
- Wronskian of Airy functions.
- Does vanishing of wronskian of solutions at point $\implies$ solutions are linearly dependent?
- Wronskian is infinite
- Linear dependence and linear independence of functions in linear algebra
- Wronskian of set of solutions to $2$nd order ODE vs systems of two $1$st order ODEs
- Wronskian is not defined
- Principle of Superposition and Wronskian
- Clarification of Wronskian
- When using the Frobenius method, and r1-r2 is neither zero nor a positive integer, can you use the Wronskian to find the second solution?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The link in the comments contains interesting responses towards solving the question, but here I would like to add a derivation based on the properties of the Levi-Civita symbol, which is very concise in my opinion, at the cost of handling some indices and tensor calculus conventions.
The determinant of the $n\times n$ matrix can be written
$$n!\det B=\epsilon_{i_1...i_n}\epsilon_{j_1...j_n}B_{i_1j_1}...B_{i_nj_n}$$
where all the indices here are summed over their range. Since $\dot{B}_{i_kj_k}=A_{j_k \ell}B_{i_k\ell}$ we can take the derivative of this relation:
$$n!\dot{W}=\sum_k\epsilon_{i_1...i_n}\epsilon_{j_1...j_n}A_{j_k \ell}B_{i_k\ell}\prod _{m\neq k}B_{i_mj_m}$$
Now notice that $\epsilon_{i_1...i_n}B_{i_1j_1}...B_{i_k\ell}...B_{i_nj_n}=\epsilon_{j_1...\ell...j_n}W $
which leads us, after reordering indices appropriately and taking account of the minus signs generated, to the relation
$$n!\dot{W}=W\sum_k\epsilon_{\ell j_1...j_n}\epsilon_{j_k j_1...j_n}A_{j_k \ell}$$
Here, note that $\epsilon_{\ell j_1...j_n}\epsilon_{j_k j_1...j_n}=(n-1)!\delta_{\ell j_k}$ which allows us to write
$$n!\dot{W}=(n-1)!W\sum_k\delta_{ \ell j_k }A_{j_k\ell}=(n-1)!\sum_{k=1}^n(\text{tr} A) W\Rightarrow\dot{W}=(\text{tr}A(t))W $$