Deriving a bound on an integral

51 Views Asked by At

I'm trying to follow a result in a paper and I can't get it to work out.

The result requires deriving the bound

\begin{equation} \int_{\mathbb{R}^N\times\mathbb{R}_+} \left|\frac{\mathrm{d}\psi}{\mathrm{d}t}\right|^p \psi^{1-p}\mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}t \leq CR^{N+k-pk}, \end{equation}

where we have:

  • $\psi:\mathbb{R}^N\times\mathbb{R}_+ \to \mathbb{R}$,
  • $\psi(x,t) = \phi(\frac{t^{2/k} + |x|^2}{R^2})$,
  • $\phi \in C^{\infty}_0(\mathbb{R})$,
  • $\phi(s) = 1$ for $s<1$ and $\phi(s) = 0$ for $s>2$,
  • $|\phi'(s)| \leq C\phi^{1/q}(s)$ with $q$ such that $p = q/(q-1)$,

For $C>0$ denoting any (not necessarily the same) constant, and $R, k >0$ and $p, q>1$ fixed positive constants.

It is straightforward to get the original integral is equal to

\begin{equation} \int_{\mathbb{R}^N\times\mathbb{R}_+} |\phi'|^p |\frac{2}{kR^2}t^{(2/k)-1}|^p\phi^{1-p}\mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}t \leq CR^{-2p}\int_{\mathbb{R}^N\times\mathbb{R}_+} \phi^{p/q}\phi^{1-p} t^{(2p/k)-p}\mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}t. \end{equation}

Now, $\phi^{p/q}\phi^{1-p} = \phi^0$ and so is equal to zero for $|x|^2 > 2R^2 - t^{2/k}$, and equal to one otherwise. This allows us to evaluate the spatial part of the latter integral in radial coordinates as \begin{equation} C\int_0^{\sqrt{2R^2 - t^{2/k}}} r^{N-1}\mathrm{d}r = C(2R^2 - t^{2/k})^{N/2} \end{equation}

and so we're left with a time integral of the form \begin{equation} CR^{-2p}\int_0^{(\sqrt{2}R)^k} (2R^2 - t^{2/k})^{N/2}t^{(2p/k)-p}\mathrm{d}t. \end{equation}

This is where I get stuck - the obvious substitution would work were it not for that pesky factor of $p$ and that's where I run out of ideas. I feel like given the rather simple form of the given bound it shouldn't be that hard and there may be a flaw in my reasoning somewhere, most likely in the way I've treated the $\phi^{p/q}\phi^{1-p}$ and ensuing spatial integral, but I can't see it at the moment. Alternatively I'm missing an obvious trick and the integral can be easily evaluated or at least bounded in some way. Any input would be appreciated.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

Well, I figured it out in case anyone is interested. Shouldn't really have taken me as long as it did, probably, given where I was.

It turns out the 'pesky' factor of $p$ preventing a nice clean integral evaluation can be dealt with using good old Cauchy-Schwarz. The trick is to rewrite the last integral as

\begin{equation} CR^{-2p}\int_0^{(\sqrt{2}R)^k} (2R^2 - t^{2/k})^{N/2}t^{(1/k)-(1/2)}t^{(2p-1)((1/k)-(1/2))}\mathrm{d}t, \end{equation}

and then applying Cauchy-Schwarz separating the terms like $(2R^2 - t^{2/k})^{N/2}t^{(1/k)-(1/2)}$ and $t^{(2p-1)((1/k)-(1/2))}$ we can bound this by

\begin{equation} CR^{-2p}\left(\int_0^{(\sqrt{2}R)^k} (2R^2 - t^{2/k})^{N}t^{(2/k)-1}\mathrm{d}t\right)^{1/2}\left(\int_0^{(\sqrt{2}R)^k} t^{(2p-1)((2/k)-1)}\mathrm{d}t\right)^{1/2}. \end{equation}

We are now able to evaluate the first of the terms in parentheses with a simple substitution to get, on taking the square root, $CR^{N+1}$and the second directly to get (again after taking the square root) $CR^{2p-1-pk + k}$. The result then follows immediately.