Let $\phi: M_n (\mathbb C) \rightarrow M_n (\mathbb C)$ be a given map of which we know that it is of the form $A \mapsto U^* AU$ where $U \in M_n (\mathbb C)$ is a unitary. I guess the unitary $U$ will be unique up to multiplication with elements of the circle $\mathbb T \subseteq \mathbb C$. Is there an algorithm to find out how $U$ has to look like for a certain $\phi$?
2026-04-25 06:54:25.1777100065
Detecting unitary $U$ if $U^* AU$ is given
46 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
We can extract all the information we need from $\phi$ by plugging in matrices of the form $E_{jk} = e_je_k^*$ (the matrix with a $1$ in the $j,k$ entry and zeros everywhere else). We can construct a suitable $U$ as follows:
If $v_1,\dots,v_n$ denote the columns of $U^*$, then we find $$ \phi(E_{ij}) = U^*e_je_k^*U = v_jv_k^* $$ With that in mind, proceed as follows: for $j = 1,\dots,n$, compute $\phi(E_{jj}) = v_jv_j^*$. The matrix $\phi(E_{jj})$ has at least one non-zero column; normalize this column to produce $v_j$. With that, we now have $n$ vectors $v_1,\dots,v_n$, and taking the matrix $U$ such that the columns of $U^*$ are $v_1,\dots,v_n$ will almost give us a $U$ which induces the transformation $\phi$.
From there, we need to multiply each $v_j$ by a suitable scalar. In particular, it is necessary that the $v_j$ satisfy $\phi(E_{ij})(p,q) = v_i(p)\overline{v_j(q)}$.
That is, we could apply the following steps:
Notably, we find that if $U$ and $V$ are unitary matrices which induce the same map, then $$ U^*AU = V^*AV \qquad \text{for all }A \iff\\ AUV^* = UV^*A \qquad \text{for all }A $$ which implies that $UV^*$ is a multiple of the identity. That is, $U$ and $V$ will induce the same map $\phi$ if and only if $UV^* = \omega I$ for some $\omega \in \Bbb T$. So, we must have $U = \omega V$ for some $\omega \in \Bbb T$.