$G = S_4$, $H = \{(1),(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)\}$.
I just did it the long way, and found H to be normal. Is there a better way than finding left and right cosets? I don't want to spend this kind of time during a test if it comes up again.
$G = S_4$, $H = \{(1),(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)\}$.
I just did it the long way, and found H to be normal. Is there a better way than finding left and right cosets? I don't want to spend this kind of time during a test if it comes up again.
On
In the case of $G = S_n$, two elements $g_1, g_2$ are conjugate (i.e. $g_1 = g g_2 g^{-1}$ for some $g \in G$) if and only if they have the same cycle type; that is, they are composed of the same number of cycles of the same lengths. In this case, $(1)$ has cycle type $(1,1,1,1)$, the other three elements of $H$ have cycle type $(2,2)$, and there are no other elements of $G$ with either of those cycle types. So every conjugate of an element of $H$ must be in $H$ itself, which is equivalent to saying that $H$ is normal.
On
If you know a set of generators for G and a set of generators for H, then, as long as G is finite, you can check that H is normal by verifying that conjugating each generating element of H by each generating element of G in turn gives you an element which is again in H. If G or H are infinite, then you need to make sure that the respective generating sets are closed under inversion (i.e. $x \in S \implies x^{-1} \in S$). If you don't know generating sets for G or H, you can also use all of the elements.
For instance, in your example, there's a generating set of $S_4$ with only two elements (I hope you know this!). Just using that alone brings the amount of computation needed way down!
This follows from a couple of facts:
If $xhx^{-1} \in H$ for all $h\in H$ and for all $g\in G$ the subgroup $H$ is normal.