I have tried a lot of things with this Cayley Table (several Julia/Python scripts which iterate over various functions, symbolic regression, semi-manually trying various permutation groups, octonions, etc) but they haven't really turned out to give me an answer yet.
I have this Cayley Table which appears to be non-associative (so not a group?). I am not 'really a mathematician', so perhaps this is simpler than I it seems to me. This problem is from a recent paper on 'grokking' if that matters to anyone.
Here is the Cayley Table:
| ★ | a | b | c | d | e |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | a | d | ? | c | d |
| b | c | d | d | a | c |
| c | ? | e | d | b | d |
| d | a | ? | ? | b | c |
| e | b | b | c | ? | a |
Am I missing a typical way to approach this problem other than trying symbolic regression on it? Unfortunately - at least the way I have tried - this requires assuming the elements are some set of arbitrarily chosen integers, or other data structure - which is obviously not ideal. I tried iterating through the 'properties' of the system (i.e. non-associative) but it left me empty handed since I don't know what the general ontology I'm traversing is. Apologies for completely misusing the terminology here - I still have a lot to learn since mathematics is not directly my field of study.
There are $5^{25}$=298 quadrillion possible binary operations $[0..4]^2\to[0..4]$, so you probably need to narrow things down somehow. All possible functions are attainable as polynomials, so that doesn't limit anything. (For proof, make "indicator" functions like $I_3(k) := 4(k-0)(k-1)(k-2)(k-4)$ that vanish except at 3, then put $f(x, y) = \sum_{a,b} f(a,b)I_a(x)I_b(y)$.)
I tried this Python script, which tries most of the operations listed Appendix A in that paper, and shuffles among all possible assignments of a, b, c, d, and e:
The result:
So in other words, $a=0$, $b=2$, $c=1$, $d=4$, and $e=3$, with $a\star b = x^2 + xy + y^2 + x \pmod 5$.