Why we talk about diagonalization problem in case of linear operator only not in case T: V->W where dimV =dimW
2026-03-30 14:25:29.1774880729
Diagonalization problem in linear algebra
57 Views Asked by user333083 https://math.techqa.club/user/user333083/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIAGONALIZATION
- Determining a $4\times4$ matrix knowing $3$ of its $4$ eigenvectors and eigenvalues
- Show that $A^m=I_n$ is diagonalizable
- Simultaneous diagonalization on more than two matrices
- Diagonalization and change of basis
- Is this $3 \times 3$ matrix diagonalizable?
- Matrix $A\in \mathbb{R}^{4\times4}$ has eigenvectors $\bf{u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4}$ satisfying $\bf{Au_1=5u_1,Au_2=9u_2}$ & $\bf{Au_3=20u_3}$. Find $A\bf{w}$.
- Block diagonalizing a Hermitian matrix
- undiagonizable matrix and annhilating polynom claims
- Show that if $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of matrix $A$ and $B$, then it is an eigenvalue of $B^{-1}AB$
- Is a complex symmetric square matrix with zero diagonal diagonalizable?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A linear map $T:\>V\to W$ between different spaces can always be diagonalized, because we can choose two bases in $V$ and $W$ separately.
Begin by choosing a basis $(f_1,\ldots, f_r)$ of the subspace $U:=T(V)\subset W$, and supplement these $r$ vectors to a basis $(f_1,\ldots, f_r,f_{r+1},\ldots, f_n)$ of all of $W$. Choose $r$ vectors $e_i\in V$ $(1\leq i\leq r)$ with $Te_i=f_i$. Note that the rank of $T$ is $r$. It follows that ${\rm dim}({\rm ker}\,T)=n-r$. We now end up with choosing a basis $(e_{r+1},\ldots, e_n)$ of ${\rm ker}\,T\subset V$. I claim that $(e_1,\ldots,e_r,e_{r+1},\ldots, e_n)$ is a basis of $V$.
Proof. If $s:=\sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i\,e_i=0$ then $Ts=\sum_{i=1}^r \lambda_i f_i=0$, hence $\lambda_i=0$ $(1\leq i\leq r)$, since the$f_i$ are linearly independent. From $\sum_{i=r+1}^n\lambda_i\,e_i=0$ it then follows that the $\lambda_i$ with $i>r$ are $=0$ as well.
The matrix of $T$ with respect to these bases has all zeros, except at the places $(i,i)$ with $1\leq i\leq r$, where there is a $1$.