difference between $(a\cup b)^{*}$ and $(a+b)^{*}$, i tried to search for concrete answer but nowherebi could find it? are they both same in terms of regular expression
2026-03-27 09:37:58.1774604278
difference between $( a\cup b)^{*}$ and $(a+b)^{*}$
41 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REGULAR-LANGUAGE
- How to approach regular languages using the pumping lemma?
- How to prove by induction that a string is a member of a recursively defined language?
- Formally expressing regular expression
- Deciding wether a language is regular, in the arithmetic hierarchy
- How to derive the set notation from regular expressions?
- Given language, say if it is regular, context-free and proove it.
- Given L1 is regular language and L1△L2 is regular is L2 regular?
- Proving a Language is Regular via Automata
- How to prove that a transformed language is regular using an NFA
- Find an automaton that recognizes this language
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is just two different notations of the same language. The symbol $+$ is used in this context, because the set of all languages is a semiring with union as addition and the usual product of languages as multiplication. The identity element for the union is the empty language, and hence it is convenient to denote it by $0$. Similarly, the identity element for the product is the language reduced to the empty word, which is convenient to denote by $1$. With this notation, one gets the following algebraic identities on languages ($L, L_1, L_2, L_3$ are arbitrary languages): \begin{align} L_1 + L_2 &= L_2 + L_1 &&\text{(commutativity of the addition)} \\ (L_1 + L_2) + L_3 &= L_1 + (L_2 + L_3) &&\text{(associativity of the addition)}\\ 0 + L &= L = L + 0 &&\text{($0$ is the identity element for the addition)} \\ (L_1 L_2)L_3 &= L_1(L_2 L_3) &&\text{(associativity of the product)}\\ 1 L &= L = L1 &&\text{($1$ is the identity element for the product)}\\ (L_1 + L_2)L &= L_1L + L_2L &&\text{(distributivity on the right)}\\ L(L_1 + L_2) &= LL_1 + LL_2 &&\text{(distributivity on the left)}\\ 0L &= 0 = L0 &&\text{$0$ is absorbing with respect to product} \end{align} If you want to reverse to usual set notation, just substitute $\cup$ for $+$, $\emptyset$ for $0$ and $\{1\}$ for $1$.