$\forall x\in S, \forall z\in S,\exists y\in C, (x\neq z) \Rightarrow ...$
$\forall x\in S, \forall z\in S, \exists y\in C,...$
Why is there a need for $x \ne z$ in 1. Isn't it already implied that x and z are different?
Thanks.
$\forall x\in S, \forall z\in S,\exists y\in C, (x\neq z) \Rightarrow ...$
$\forall x\in S, \forall z\in S, \exists y\in C,...$
Why is there a need for $x \ne z$ in 1. Isn't it already implied that x and z are different?
Thanks.
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
No. They could be the same.
$\forall x \in \mathbb{Z}\, \forall y \in \mathbb{Z}\,, x-y \neq 0$
is not the same as
$\forall x \in \mathbb{Z}\, \forall y \in \mathbb{Z}\,, (x\neq y) \implies x-y \neq 0$