Let $\Omega\subset\Bbb R^d$ be a bounded domain and suppose that $\partial \Omega$ is $C^\infty$. Suppose that you are given $v_0=\sum_{j}a_ju_j$, where each $u_j\in H_0^1(\Omega)$ is an eigenvector for $-\Delta$ with associated eigenvalue $\lambda_j$. I'd like to verify that $$ v(x,t)=\sum_{j} e^{-\lambda_jt}c_ju_j $$ is a solution of the heat equation $$ \begin{cases} \partial_t v - \Delta v=0 &\text{ in }\Omega\times(0,\infty)\\ v=0&\text{ in }\partial\Omega\times(0,\infty) \\ v(x,0)=v_0 &\text{ in }\Omega.\end{cases}\label{E}\tag{E} $$ My question is, how to manage the derivative in $t$? For the derivatives in $x$, I guess I can look at the weak form of problem \eqref{E} and use that $\nabla$ is continuous on $H_0^1(\Omega)$ to differentiate under the sum. Is there an inequality that allows us to manage the derivative in $t$?
2026-03-28 07:00:01.1774681201
Differentiation of infinite sum in the solution to heat equation
101 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SOBOLEV-SPACES
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- $\mbox{Cap}_p$-measurability
- If $u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )$ is s.t. $\nabla u=0$ then $u$ is constant a.e.
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Variational Formulation - inhomogeneous Neumann boundary
- Why the Sobolev space $W^{1,2}(M,N)$ weak-sequencially closed in $W^{1,2}(\mathbb R^K)$?
- Sobolev space $H^s(Q)$ is Hilbert
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- How to define discrete Sobolev dual norm so that it can be computed?
- Weakly sequentially continuous maps
Related Questions in HEAT-EQUATION
- Solving the heat equation with robin boundary conditions
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- Computing an inverse Fourier Transform / Solving the free particle Schrödinger equation with a gaussian wave packet as initial condition
- Bound on the derivatives of heat kernel.
- Imposing a condition that is not boundary or initial in the 1D heat equation
- 1-D Heat Equation, bounding difference in $\alpha$ given surface temperature
- Heat equation for a cylinder in cylindrical coordinates
- Heat Equation in Cylindrical Coordinates: Sinularity at r = 0 & Neumann Boundary Conditions
- Applying second-order differential operator vs applying first-order differential operator twice?
- Physical Interpretation of Steady State or Equilibrium Temperature.
Related Questions in REGULARITY-THEORY-OF-PDES
- If $q>p$ then $H^q([0,2\pi])$ is dense in $H^p([0,2\pi])$>
- Motivation to define the boundary value
- 1-D Heat Equation, bounding difference in $\alpha$ given surface temperature
- Implications of weak convergence on the Lebesgue space to Sobolev space
- Harnack type Estimates for a p-Poisson equation with constant source term
- Regularity solution of the Poisson equation with mixed boundary condition
- Intuition for compact embedding of $H^1([0,1])$ in $L^2([0,1])$?
- Young's inequality with duality bracket
- laplace equation $L^p$ estimate
- Interior Gradient Estimate for the p-Elliptic equation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
To differentiate an infinite sum, you can use the theorem of derivation under the integral, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz_integral_rule in the section "Measure theory statement". Indeed, you can see a sum as an integral with respect to the counting measure.
What you have to verify then is that the absolute values of the time derivatives of $t \mapsto e^{-\lambda_jt}a_ju_j$ are bounded by some non negative $\theta_j$ that don't depend on the time such that $\sum_{j \geqslant 0} \theta_j < +\infty$.
Indeed, for all $|\partial_te^{-\lambda_jt}a_ju_j| = \lambda_je^{-\lambda_jt}|a_ju_j| \leqslant \lambda_j|a_ju_j|$ (remember that the $\lambda_j$ are non negative because $-\Delta$ is self-adjoint and positive semi-definite). Therefore, your constants $a_j$ must be such that for all $x \in \Omega$, $\sum_{j \geqslant 0} \lambda_j|a_ju_j(x)| < +\infty$. In this case, everything works perfectly.
Notice that it you only assume that $\sum_{j \geqslant 0} |a_ju_j(x)| < +\infty$, then for all $t \geqslant t_0 > 0$, you have $\sum_{j \geqslant 0} \lambda_je^{-\lambda_jt_0}|a_ju_j(x)| < +\infty$ because $\lambda_je^{-\lambda_jt_0} \leqslant 1$ for $j$ large enough (remeber that $\lambda_j \rightarrow +\infty$) thus $(x,t) \mapsto v(x,t)$ admits derivatives with respect to $t$ for all $x$ and all $t \geqslant t_0 > 0$, hence for all positive time, but a priori not at $t = 0$.