If $H$ and $K$ are both normal subgroups of $G$, and if every element of $G$ can be written uniquely as $hk$ with $h\in H$ and $k\in K$ (so $G$ is the direct product of $H$ and $K$), does it follow that $H$ and $K$ commute, i.e. that $kh=hk$ always?
2026-03-28 06:24:01.1774679041
Direct product and commutativity of factors
284 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GROUP-THEORY
- What is the intersection of the vertices of a face of a simplicial complex?
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- How to construct a group whose "size" grows between polynomially and exponentially.
- Conjugacy class formula
- $G$ abelian when $Z(G)$ is a proper subset of $G$?
- A group of order 189 is not simple
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
- subgroups that contain a normal subgroup is also normal
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
Related Questions in NORMAL-SUBGROUPS
- subgroups that contain a normal subgroup is also normal
- Prime Ideals in Subrings
- Comparing centers of group and a subgroup
- Example for subgroups $H$ and $K$ where $HK = K H$ and neither $H$ nor $K$ is normal?
- How to show that every group in the normal series of $G$ is normal in $G$
- Lie groups with SU(12) as a subgroup
- determine if a subgroup of a free group is normal
- Is being a contranormally closed subgroup a transitive property?
- $G_{1}, G_{2} \triangleleft G$, $G_{1}G_{2} = G$, $G_{1} \cap G_{2} = \{ e \}$ implies $G_{1} \times G_{2} \cong G$?
- For prime $p$, normal subgroups of $SL(2, \mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z)$ remains normal in $GL(2, \mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z)$?
Related Questions in DIRECT-PRODUCT
- Krull dimension of a direct product of rings
- Is the map $G*H \to G \times H$ injective?
- Is free product of groups always bigger that direct product?
- In GAP, How can I check whether a given group is a direct product?
- $V^*$ is isomorphic to the direct product of copies of $F$ indexed by $A$
- Prove that $\mathbb{Z}_{5}[x]/(x^2+1)$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}_{5} \times \mathbb{Z}_{5}$.
- Subdirect products
- If $(g,h)\in G\times H$ with $|g|=r$ and $|h|=s$, then $|(g,h)|=\operatorname{lcm}(r,s)$.
- Using Direct Proofs in Discrete Math
- Symmetric Direct Product Distributive?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes, that is always true. Note that $G$ being the direct product of $H$ and $K$ means that the map $\Phi\colon G\to H\times K$ given by $hk\mapsto (h,k)$ is an isomorphism, where $H\times K$ carries the group structure given by $(h_1,k_1)(h_2,k_2)=(h_1h_2,k_1k_2)$. Under this isomorphism, note that $$ \Phi(kh) = \Phi((1k)(h1)) = \Phi(1k)\Phi(h1) = (1,k)(h,1) = (1h,k1) = (h,k) = \Phi(hk). $$ So $\Phi(kh)=\Phi(hk)$ and hence $kh=hk$.
To elaborate on the direct proof suggested by @AugustLiu in the comments: We have $H\cap K = \{1\}$, since otherwise $1\neq g\in H\cap K$ would have the two different expressions $$ g = \underbrace{g}_{\in H} \cdot \underbrace{1}_{\in K} = \underbrace{1}_{\in H} \cdot \underbrace{g}_{\in K}. $$ Now note that since $H$ and $K$ are normal subgroups, we have $$ H \ni \underbrace{(khk^{-1})}_{\in H} \, \underbrace{h^{-1}}_{\in H} = \underbrace{k}_{\in K} \underbrace{(hk^{-1}h^{-1})}_{\in K} \in K $$ so that $khk^{-1}h^{-1}\in H\cap K=\{1\}$. Hence $khk^{-1}h^{-1}=1$, which is equivalent to $kh=hk$.
Yet another proof goes like this: The element $kh\in G$ must have a unique expression $kh=h'k'$ with $h'\in H$ and $k'\in K$. However, this yields $$ h = k^{-1} h' k' = \underbrace{(k^{-1} h' k)}_{\in H} \underbrace{(k^{-1} k')}_{\in K} $$ and the unique expression of $h$ as a product of an element in $H$ and an element in $K$ is $h=h\cdot 1$, so that $1=k^{-1} k'$ and hence $k'=k$. By a similar argument $h'=h$ and hence $kh=hk$.