Given a complete graph of $n$ vertices. Each edge $ab$ is given a direction (either $a\rightarrow b$ or $b\rightarrow a$). Is it possible that these two conditions are satisfied simultaneously?
(i) There is no cycle.
(ii) The vertices cannot be labeled $a_1,\ldots,a_n$ in such a way that $a_i\rightarrow a_j$ if and only if $i<j$.
Here's a more rigorous proof. Suppose you have such a directed complete graph. I'll say that a vertex $a < b$ if there is an edge $a\rightarrow b$.
Claim: If there are no cycles, then there exists a "minimum" vertex $v$, in the sense that every edge goes out of $v$.
Proof of claim: We proceed by induction. This is certainly true for directed complete graphs (DCG) of size 2. Suppose we know the claim for any DCG of size $n$. Any DCG of size $n+1$ (call it $G'$) is obtained from a DCG of size $n$ (call it $G$) by adding a new vertex $v$, and choosing edges from $v$ to every vertex of $G$. Let $w$ be the minimum vertex of $G$. If there is an edge $w\rightarrow v$, then of course $w$ is the minimum vertex for $G'$. If instead you have a edge $v\rightarrow w$, then for any vertex $w'\in G$, we already have edges $w\rightarrow w'$, and so the edge connecting $v$ and $w'$ must go $v\rightarrow w'$ (otherwise you'd get a cycle $v\rightarrow w\rightarrow w'\rightarrow v$). This shows that $v$ is the minimum vertex for $G'$.
This shows that every DCG with no cycles has a minimum. Thus, let $G$ be a DCG with size $n$. Then it has a minimum vertex, so label it $v_1$. The remaining $n-1$ vertices form a DCG with size $n-1$. It must also have a minimum vertex, so label it $v_2$. The remaining $n-2$ vertices form a DCG with size $n-2$...etc.
This procedure naturally gives you a labeling as described in (ii).