Suppose we have a relation on a set $A$, i.e. $A \times A$, where $|A| = n; \;n$ a positive integer. How can we count the number of relations on set $A$ which are reflexive, symmetric, transitive and anti-symmetric?
2026-04-09 03:56:46.1775707006
Discrete and combinatorial mathematics
68 Views Asked by user99351 https://math.techqa.club/user/user99351/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in RELATIONS
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- Is a relation on which every element is related with itself alone transitive?
- Relation power composition
- Order relation proof
- Order relation proof ...
- How to identify if a given Hasse diagram is a lattice
- Is the relation < a strict total order?
- Is there a name for this property on a binary relation?
- Finding all reflexive binary relations of a set
- Showing that a relation is reflexive, symmetric and transitive
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As HSN mentioned in a comment: if you want all four of these properties satisfied, then there isn't a lot to do: any relation which is both symmetric and antisymmetric is a subset of the "=" relation... if you further want it to be reflexive, then it can ONLY be the "=" relation, where $xRy$ if and only if $x=y$.
Now, if you're trying to count each property separately, then there's something you can do.
For instance: if you are trying to count all relations on $A$ which are reflexive, you are really trying to find the number of subsets of $A\times A$ such that the diagonal $\Delta:=\{(a,a)\mid a\in A\}$ satisfies $\Delta\subseteq R$. You have the freedom to decide whether or not any OTHER element of $A\times A$ is contained in $R$; so, there are $2^{n^2-n}$ such relations, since there are $n^2-n$ elements in $(A\times A)\setminus\Delta$.
You could also pretty easily count the number of symmetric relations: in symmetric relations, we either include both of $(a,b)$ and $(b,a)$, or neither, for all $a\neq b$; we also either include $(a,a)$ or don't. From elements of the type $(a,a)$, there are $2^n$ possibilities; for the rest, there are $2^{\binom{n}{2}}$. So, the total here is $2^{n+\binom{n}{2}}$.
And so on.