I had an idea I was wondering how I would go about it. I have only just started high school calculus so forgive my inexperience. Imagine the 3-dimensional plot of a complex function, $F(a+bi)$. There is the real dimension, the complex dimension, and the function's dimension. Now is there a way to look at this function only in the real dimension and the $F(a+bi)$ dimension, yet plotting all of the complex values onto the 2-D surface? The only way I can describe it is like this. Imagine looking straight at the real number line of this 3-D graph and removing the depth of the complex dimension so that you're left with a 2-D plane but keeping the functional plots of all the complex values. How can we manipulate the function itself to not be changed, but remove this dimension and stick all the complex values onto the real plane. If anyone can understand what I'm trying to say, could they rephrase it in math lingo and help show me how to mathematically accomplish this? Thanks.
2025-01-12 19:14:25.1736709265
Disguising a complex function as a real function.
51 Views Asked by tyobrien https://math.techqa.club/user/tyobrien/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-NUMBERS
- Prove that the complex number $z=t_1z_1+t_2z_2+t_3z_3$ lies inside a triangle with vertices $z_1,z_2,z_3$ or on its boundary.
- If there exist real numbers $a,b,c,d$ for which $f(a),f(b),f(c),f(d)$ form a square on the complex plane.Find the area of the square.
- Disguising a complex function as a real function.
- $Z^4 = -1$ How do I solve this without a calculator?
- Showing that a subset of the complex plane is open.
- Topology ad Geometry of $\mathbb{C}^n/\mathbb{Z}_k$
- How to derive the value of $\log(-1)$?
- If $z^5-32$ can be factorised into linear and quadratic factors over real coefficients as $(z^5-32)=(z-2)(z^2-pz+4)(z^2-qz+4)$,then find $p^2+2p.$
- All roots of the equation $a_0z^n+a_1z^{n-1}+.....+a_{n-1}z+a_n=n$,lie outside the circle with center at the origin and radius $\frac{n-1}{n}$.
- A problem on complex no.
Related Questions in GRAPHING-FUNCTIONS
- Disguising a complex function as a real function.
- Find all points $(a,b)$ for which all roots of $ax^2 + 2bx + 4a = 0$ are higher than 1.
- Plotting solutions to first order system
- Can someone give me some guidance on this?
- Getting the rational function with given characteristics
- Finding equations for the horizontal tangents to a curve?
- Finding all points on a graph with tangent lines passing through a particular point?
- Finding the equation of the tangent (in slope-intercept form) at a particular point?
- Finding the derivative for a product of two polynomial functions?
- How to sketch what would a 3-D graph parallel to an axis look like?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
You want to project the graph of $z = F(x+iy)$ onto the plane $y = 0$.
The problem with doing this is the graph of $z = F(x+iy)$ is an undulating surface. When you project in onto the $xz$-plane, it will in general fill large portions of this plane, and for functions of particular interest, quite often fills the entire plane. So instead of getting something useful that helps to you in understanding the function's behavior, you just get a big blob that doesn't show you much at all about the function.
You can improve on this a little by using color - assigning a sprectrum to points based on the value of $y$, but this only works when each point in the final graph comes from exactly one point of the function (i.e. you never have $F(x + iy_1) = F(x + iy_2)$ for some $x, y_1, y_2$). Another alternative is to not to to project the points for all $y$, but only for some sample, such as $y = 0, 1, 2, ...$. This provides a series of curves that in some cases may be useful in visualizing the actual function behavior. In others, though, it just provides a jumbled mess.
Generally, your best bet is a true 3D graph.