My textbook states that: If $\lim\limits_{x \to \infty } a_n$ doesn't exist OR $\lim\limits_{x \to \infty } a_n$ $\ne$ 0, then $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n$$ would be divergent. My question is: Why are the two conditions stated with "Or". Say if my limit is 1, 1 $\ne$ 0 but it is existent. Is there something I'm missing or am I just lacking some brain cells XD
**Note: I get it now. Turns out I lack brain cells in the morning. Thanks for answering my question **
** Edit: Turns out I can't spell either **
$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}a_{n}\ne 0$ means that the limit of $(a_{n})$ exists, and the limit is not zero.
A sequence cannot both exist and not exist, so that is the reason putting the word OR.
$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(-1)^{n}$ does not exist, and $\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}$ is divergent.
One cannot say $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(-1)^{n}\ne 0$.