I have seen multiple answers on the web, but I can't get my mind around why division by zero outputs an error and not zero. Can anyone explain this in laymen's terms?
2026-03-26 22:12:10.1774563130
Divison by Zero
52 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIVISIBILITY
- Reciprocal-totient function, in term of the totient function?
- Can we find integers $x$ and $y$ such that $f,g,h$ are strictely positive integers
- Positive Integer values of a fraction
- Reciprocal divisibility of equally valued polynomials over a field
- Which sets of base 10 digits have the property that, for every $n$, there is a $n$-digit number made up of these digits that is divisible by $5^n$?
- For which natural numbers are $\phi(n)=2$?
- Interesting property about finite products of $111..1$'s
- Turn polynomial into another form by using synthetic division
- Fractions of the form $\frac{a}{k}\cdot\frac{b}{k}\cdot\frac{c}{k}\cdots=\frac{n}{k}$
- Proof: If $7\mid 4a$, then $7\mid a$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Well, let's try it. Let's divide $x$ by $0$ and say it's equal to some number $y$. Then
$$\frac x0=y.$$
By definition, we may multiply both sides by $0$, and see $x=y\cdot0=0$. This isn't true; we didn't assume $x$ to be zero. However, this tells us the only number we can divide by $0$ is $0$ itself; indeed, $\tfrac00=y$ doesn't result in a contradiction.
The problem with saying $\tfrac00$ is defined, is that it is everything at once. It doesn't have only one value. $\tfrac00=1$ wouldn't reach a contradiction (not by multiplying by $0$, that is) and neither would $\tfrac00=0$. In mathematics, we like things to only represent one thing and one thing only. If we would let $\tfrac00$ mean both $0$ and $1$ at the same time, then we wouldn't be able to use $=$ like we want; if we did, then
$$0=\frac00=1\implies 0=1$$
So, that would be a hassle for just letting this thing that is everything at once exist. Hence, we just agree to not divide by $0$, so we can keep all our rules, axioms, and theorems we know.