I have been researching topics that I can study next year for an independent reading course, and stochastic calculus seems very interesting. i have not studied stochastic processes at all, and from my research online I have found that the two subjects have very little overlap. I don't know how true that is, and I was wondering if its possible to study stochastic calculus without knowing stochastic processes?
2026-03-25 07:42:00.1774424520
Do you need to know stochastic processes to learn stochastic calculus?
1.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in STATISTICS
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- Statistics based on empirical distribution
- Given $U,V \sim R(0,1)$. Determine covariance between $X = UV$ and $V$
- Fisher information of sufficient statistic
- Solving Equation with Euler's Number
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- KL divergence between two multivariate Bernoulli distribution
- Given random variables $(T_1,T_2)$. Show that $T_1$ and $T_2$ are independent and exponentially distributed if..
- Probability of tossing marbles,covariance
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-PROCESSES
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
- Probability being in the same state
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Why does there exists a random variable $x^n(t,\omega')$ such that $x_{k_r}^n$ converges to it
- Compute the covariance of $W_t$ and $B_t=\int_0^t\mathrm{sgn}(W)dW$, for a Brownian motion $W$
- Why has $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s$ the same distribution as $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s-B_t$ for a Brownian motion $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$?
- What is the name of the operation where a sequence of RV's form the parameters for the subsequent one?
- Markov property vs. transition function
- Variance of the integral of a stochastic process multiplied by a weighting function
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-CALCULUS
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Why does there exists a random variable $x^n(t,\omega')$ such that $x_{k_r}^n$ converges to it
- Compute the covariance of $W_t$ and $B_t=\int_0^t\mathrm{sgn}(W)dW$, for a Brownian motion $W$
- Mean and variance of $X:=(k-3)^2$ for $k\in\{1,\ldots,6\}$.
- 4th moment of a Wiener stochastic integral?
- Unsure how to calculate $dY_{t}$
- What techniques for proving that a stopping time is finite almost surely?
- Optional Stopping Theorem for martingales
- $dX_t=\alpha X_t \,dt + \sqrt{X_t} \,dW_t, $ with $X_0=x_0,\,\alpha,\sigma>0.$ Compute $E[X_t] $ and $E[Y]$ for $Y=\lim_{t\to\infty}e^{-\alpha t}X_t$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I think it depends in what context you want to study stochastic calculus.
At the core of it, it's impossible to study stochastic calculus without having some intuition for stochastic processes. After all, stochastic calculus is used to evaluate differentials of stochastic processes.
However, it is possible to memorize Ito's lemma and "derive" it from intuition based on squared variation and Taylor expansion. No knowledge of stochastic processes is required to understand that if:
$$dX = \mu dt + \sigma dZ$$
Then:
$$dF \sim \frac{\partial F}{\partial t}dt + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial F}{\partial x}dX + \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial X^2}(dX)^2$$ $$= \frac{\partial F}{\partial t}dt + \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}(\mu dt + \sigma dZ) + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial X^2} (\mu^2 dt^2 + 2 \sigma\mu dtdZ + \sigma^2 dZ^2)$$
Now, here's where Ito comes in:
$dt^2 = 0$, $dZdt = 0$, $dZ^2 = dt$ And all higher order terms go to $0$
so,
$$dF = \frac{\partial F}{\partial t}dt + \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}(\mu dt + \sigma dZ) + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial X^2} (\sigma^2 dt)$$
That's it! No stochastic processes needed. You can go about solving your problem by subbing in the above expression for $dF$ instead of the standard:
$$dF = \frac{\partial F}{\partial t}dt + \frac{\partial F}{\partial Z}dZ$$
But, what kind of understanding does that build? For example, why does $E[dZ^2] = dt^2$?
It has to do with the fact that a random walk, of which brownian motion is a limiting case, has variance $\sim N$ after $N$ steps.
Stochastic calculus also makes heavy use of martingales. A martingale is a stochastic process where:
$E[X_{t} | X_s] = X_s$ for $s<t$.
$E[X^2 - t^2]$ is a martingale for brownian motion. That often makes solving problems a lot easier.
The Feynman Kac formula is another example of a concept in stochastic calculus rooted in stochastic processes. You can tilt your head to the side and say it looks like a green's function, but it's derivation is straight forward if you understand random walks and diffusion.
In summary, Stochastic differential equations describe stochastic processes that occur in continuous time. The two subjects have tremendous overlap. Diffusion is a stochastic process; jumps follow a poisson process. Moreover, if you want to actually use stochastic calculus, you'll have to have some intuition for stochastic processes. It's impossible to formulate a stochastic optimization problem or predict a most likely path if you can't describe the underlying process.
In order to get something out of your independent study, you'll have to at least familiarize yourself with probability, random walks, markov processes, and poisson processes. You don't need measure theory, though it is helpful. If you choose to start without it, as you go deeper into stochastic calculus, you'll get a significant amount of measure theory through probability theory and intuition for its role in stochastic processes. I'd recommend getting familiar with the above — it won't take more than a few weeks if you're at a high enough level — and then diving in. Learning a little about stochastic processes will payoff a hundred fold in the end and will help you in other subjects should you choose to pursue them.
Great resources for stochastic processes: