I have a separable, reflexive Banach space $(V,\|\cdot\|)$ that is continuously and densely embedded in a Hilbert space $(H,|\cdot|)$. This means, there is a bounded linear injection map $j\colon V \to H$, i.e. $|j(v)|\leq C_j\|v\|$, and $j(V)$ is dense in $H$. Then, one writes $V\hookrightarrow H$, or simply $V \subset H$, having identified $V$ with $j(V)$.
Now I assume that there are (closed) subspaces $V_1$, $V_2$ of $V$, such that $V = V_1 \oplus V_2$.
QUESTION: Do the assumptions above imply, that the minimum angle between the closures of $j(V_1)=:H_1$ and $j(V_2)=:H_2$ in $H$, that are subspaces of $H$, is bounded away from zero?
I have shown that $H_1 \cap H_2 = \{0\}$, so that - by definition - the cosine of the minimum angle is given as
$$ c:= c(H_1,H_2):=~ \sup ~\{ (h_1,h_2) ~: ~h_1 \in H_1,~ |h_1|=1,~ h_2 \in H_2,~ |h_2|=1 \} .$$
Thus, I want to have, that $c<1$, if $V\hookrightarrow H$, $V=V_1\oplus V_2$, and $H_1 = \overline{V_1}^H$ and $H_2 = \overline{V_2}^H$, where the overline denotes the closure of $j(V_i)$ in $H$, $i=1,2$.
Here are some equivalent conditions for gaps between subspaces.
Let V be a Banach space, and $V_1$ and $V_2$ subspaces with $V_1 \cap V_2 = \{0\}$. Then the statements
- $ V_1 \oplus V_2$ is closed
- $V_1^\bot \oplus V_2^\bot \subset V^*$ is closed
- $\gamma(V_1,V_2):= \inf_{u\in V_1} \frac{dist(u,V_2)}{\|u\|} > 0$
are equivalent. Furthermore, $\gamma > 0$ implies $dist(u,V_2) \geq \gamma \|u\|$, for all $u\in V_1$. The $dist$ function is defined as $dist(u,V)=\inf_{v\in V}\|u-v\|$.
These results can be found in Kato's book Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators in Chapter IV.4. With respect to the minimum angle $c$, one has:
Let $H$ be a Hilbert-space and $H_1 \subset H$ and $H_2 \subset H$ subspaces. Then the statements
- $c(H_1,H_2) < 1$
- $H_1 \cap H_2 = \{0\}$ and $H_1 \oplus H_2$ is closed
- there is a constant $\rho > 0$, such that $|h_1 + h_2| \geq \rho |h_2$, for all $h_1 \in H_1$ and $h_2 \in H_2$
- $\inf \{ dist(h_1, H_2) : h_1 \in H_1, |h_1|=1 \} > 0$
are equivalent.
These results are given in Galantai's book Projectors and Projection Methods on page 249.
Any help, hint, and counterexample is highly appreciated.
These assumptions are not sufficient.
Suppose that $V_1$ is a Banach space continuously and densely embedded into $H$ by the map $j_1 : V_1 \to H$, with $H_1 := j_1(V_1) \subsetneq H$. (For instance, you could let $H = L^2([0,1])$, and $V_1 = C([0,1])$, or perhaps $V_1 = H^1([0,1])$ if you'd like a Hilbert space). Fix some $y \in H \setminus j_1(V_1)$ (e.g. your favorite discontinuous function in $L^2([0,1])$).
Set $V_2 = \mathbb{R}$ and let $V = V_1 \oplus V_2$ be their direct sum under the norm $\|(x,\alpha)\|_{V}^2 = \|x\|_{V_1}^2 + |\alpha|^2$ (or anything equivalent). Then embed $V$ into $H$ by the map $j(x,\alpha) = j(x) + \alpha y$. $j$ is continuous, and we have $H_1 \subset j(V)$ so that $j(V)$ is dense. But $H_1$ is already dense in $H$, so its closure contains $H_2 := j(V_2) = \mathbb{R} y$. Thus the minimum angle between $H_1$ and $H_2$ is zero.