Let $C$ be a Fat Cantor set defined on $[0,1]$, and Lebesgue measure $m (C) >0$. Is it true that, if $a<b$ and $(a,b) \cap C \neq \varnothing$, then $m ((a,b) \cap C) >0$?
I believe this to be true, but I find it hard to explain formally. Roughly, if $(a,b) \cap C$ contains at least one remaining interval at a certain stage, then the argument that $C$ has positive measure also guarantees not all measure in $(a,b)$ is hollowed out, i.e., it left some measure. Since at later stage, the remaining intervals looks so "dense" (in verbal sense), I find it reasonable, but these intervals are scattered irregularly, I don't know how to write a formal proof.
Edit: Originally I wrote close interval, and I soon find the answer to be negative, but still want to know the case for open interval. Sorry to the first answerer.
The question has been edited after I posted this answer.
No, you remove some intervals to construct the fat Cantor set. So there are intervals for which the interscetion with $C$ is empty.