I am studying the Perceptron algorithm. Right now I am trying to understand if the initialization choice of $\theta$ effects the algorithm's ability to converge. I have tried experimenting by applying the algorithm to a linearly separable training set with different initial $\theta$ values, one being zero and the others non-zero values and the algorithm converged every time. However, I can't come up with a way of mathematically generalizing this pattern. I am trying to figure out how to generalize this pattern; come up with a proof for why the algorithm always converges.
2026-04-04 16:53:47.1775321627
Does choice of initial Theta effect Perceptron's convergence?
2.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MACHINE-LEARNING
- KL divergence between two multivariate Bernoulli distribution
- Can someone explain the calculus within this gradient descent function?
- Gaussian Processes Regression with multiple input frequencies
- Kernel functions for vectors in discrete spaces
- Estimate $P(A_1|A_2 \cup A_3 \cup A_4...)$, given $P(A_i|A_j)$
- Relationship between Training Neural Networks and Calculus of Variations
- How does maximum a posteriori estimation (MAP) differs from maximum likelihood estimation (MLE)
- To find the new weights of an error function by minimizing it
- How to calculate Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension?
- maximize a posteriori
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As long as the data set is linearly separable, the perceptron algorithm will always converge in $ \frac{R^2}{\gamma^2} $ iterations. The initialization does not matter.
The proof is a standard thing they explain in any ML course at university (not super trivial to come up with but simple to understand by reading the actual proof). See these notes for example:
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~mcollins/courses/6998-2012/notes/perc.converge.pdf
I found it by googling "perceptron convergence proof", hope it helps.
In fact the beauty of the prove above is that it shows that if you initialize it to zero then you errors are bounded by $R^2/\gamma^2$. So in a way, it shows that if you start with the vector 0 and update, you eventually converge in a finite number of iterations.
If the initialization affects the speed of convergence, that depends on the data set and in what order you see ur points.