Given a domain $\Omega$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and a function $f\in H_0^1(\Omega)$, the closure of the test functions on $\Omega$, does the extension of f by 0 to all of $\mathbb{R}^d$ necessarily lie in $H_0^1(\mathbb{R}^d)$?
2026-04-06 17:49:03.1775497743
Does $H_0^1(\Omega)$ embed into $H_0^1(R^d)$?
117 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SOBOLEV-SPACES
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- $\mbox{Cap}_p$-measurability
- If $u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )$ is s.t. $\nabla u=0$ then $u$ is constant a.e.
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Variational Formulation - inhomogeneous Neumann boundary
- Why the Sobolev space $W^{1,2}(M,N)$ weak-sequencially closed in $W^{1,2}(\mathbb R^K)$?
- Sobolev space $H^s(Q)$ is Hilbert
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- How to define discrete Sobolev dual norm so that it can be computed?
- Weakly sequentially continuous maps
Related Questions in DISTRIBUTION-THEORY
- $\lim_{n\to\infty}n^2(\int_{-1/n}^0u(x-s)ds -\int_0^{1/n}u(x-s)ds)$ where $u(x)$ an infinitely differentiable function on R
- Approximating derivative of Dirac delta function using mollifiers
- Distributional solution of differential equation
- Solution of partiell differential equation using the fundamental solution
- Find a sequence converging in distribution but not weakly
- How to prove this Dirac delta limit representation is correct?
- Properties about Dirac Delta derivative
- Does $\mathrm{e}^x$ belong to $\mathcal{S}'(\mathbb{R}^n)$?
- Is there a sense in which this limit is zero?
- Schwartz kernel theorem and dual topologies
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes. The big picture is that for we can glue two $H^1$-functions together using continuity.
Say let the extension be: $$ \widetilde{f}(x) = \begin{cases} f(x) & \text{ for } x\in \Omega, \\[2mm] 0 &\text{ for } x\in \mathbb{R}^d\backslash\Omega. \end{cases} $$ Apparently $\widetilde{f}\in L^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$. Now we want to find $\nabla \widetilde{f} = \big(\frac{\partial \widetilde{f}}{\partial x_i}\big)$, we don't know if this thing agrees with the weak derivative of $f$ in $\Omega$, and is 0 outside $\Omega$. We have to use the definition of the weak derivative: $$ \int_{\mathbb{R}^d} \frac{\partial \widetilde{f}}{\partial x_i} \phi = -\int_{\mathbb{R}^d} \widetilde{f}\frac{\partial\phi }{\partial x_i} \quad \text{for any }\phi\in C^{\infty}_c(\mathbb{R}^d), $$ now because of the integrability we can split the right hand side into two parts: $$ -\int_{\mathbb{R}^d} \widetilde{f}\frac{\partial\phi }{\partial x_i} = -\int_{\Omega} \widetilde{f}\frac{\partial\phi }{\partial x_i} -\int_{\mathbb{R}^d\backslash\Omega} \widetilde{f}\frac{\partial\phi }{\partial x_i} = -\int_{\Omega} f\frac{\partial\phi }{\partial x_i}. $$ Then use boundary condition of $f$: $$ -\int_{\Omega} f\frac{\partial\phi }{\partial x_i} = \int_{\Omega} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}\phi - \int_{\partial\Omega} f\phi \nu_{x_i}\,dS = \int_{\Omega} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}\phi. $$ Thus we have: $$ \int_{\mathbb{R}^d} \frac{\partial \widetilde{f}}{\partial x_i} \phi = \int_{\Omega} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}\phi \quad \text{for any }\phi\in C^{\infty}_c(\mathbb{R}^d), $$ and this tells us that $$ \nabla \widetilde{f}(x) = \begin{cases} \nabla f(x) & \text{ for } x\in \Omega, \\[2mm] 0 &\text{ for } x\in \mathbb{R}^d\backslash\Omega. \end{cases} $$ Now since $\nabla f\in L^2(\Omega)$, $\nabla \widetilde{f}\in L^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$. The extension is valid.